The term has evidently been embraced and extended to death. We can say ‘class warriors gonna class warrior’ because that's about class. Perhaps that's because class advocacy has been increasingly eclipsed by other forms of advocacy and as such has taken a back seat to all the isms and phobia. Again, interestingly, most -- as in even one above half -- of these groups have very little truck with class issues because they're by and large well off. Go figure. And if they do, well there's that virtue signaling trope again. Nothing like folks enjoying north of 100k in audio gear advocating against poverty.
But we can't say "social justice warrior gonna social justice," even though there are several areas that fall under the social justice umbrella, such as (google it)
- Race.
- Gender.
- Age.
- Sexual Orientation.
- Religion.
- Nationality.
- Education.
- Mental or Physical Ability.
Hmm .. age is number 3. Weren't we just going round not long ago about how much better off the world would be without Boomers? And would ya'll just get on with it and die? Education ... hmm. Didn't
@droodzilla fling himself into abeyance over that one? I see three on this list of 8 that gobble up the most grease. I don't think it's my imagination that those three comprise a minute subset of the human population represented by that google list. But if I were to strongly advocate that the priorities weren't exactly equitable (another social justice cornerstone) what would happen? I think the thread not terribly long ago with banned user merlin illustrates that pretty well. I don't remember it in great detail, but what I recall was that merlon was arguing in a healthcare thread and opined that the more esoteric medical needs, unlike head injuries, should naturally be triaged to a lower priority, that sort of thing. He wasn't around very long afterwards because social justice said: Bigot, be gone!
/out
