LOTUS HIFI
LOTUS Hifi
crikey .... crappy youtube but you can kinda tell this this sounds midnblowing
Last edited by a moderator:
errrrrrrr.... are they Summits ? I've heard them, they didn't make it to the shortlist
No...exactly the opposite end of the Martin Logan price range, they're probably Vistas...(now discontinued?)
Along the same lines:
Why does live music on my TV (crappy speakers in flat panel) sound more "real" than many recordings*
It does give the impression that the sound is/was very good. How can it possibly do that through compressed audio and my tiny Dell PC speakers?
Don't think about it too hard. I didn't post it up to start another infantile techno-aspergers-war.
It just sounds good. You can tell it has acres and acres of space and enourmous weight and dynamics, not the overblown fake kind with booming bass and lean over-etched detail but true life-sized natural heft ... I bet it was amazing in real life.... leave it at that.
I just can't get around the tacky cell phone bling on the base unit. Ditch the gold feet, tips on the grills and port rings, maybe face the cabinet in walnut veener and stop fighting the wonderful alien-pod look from the fifities the design naturally achieves with its form.
Why do folks insist on lipsticking something that doesn't need it?
In that case I suggest you get yourself some Dell pc speakers and give up your hifi merry-go-round.
one of my good friends, a vet in Hawaii, owns an all mbl system, cabling is all synergistic research and MIT. he upgrades every year or something stupid.
a classic "im wealthy look at my wang" system. that isn't so bad in and of itself. some people measure their self worth by material possessions, money,etc..BUT
one of my good friends, a vet in Hawaii, owns an all mbl system, cabling is all synergistic research and MIT. he upgrades every year or something stupid.
a classic "im wealthy look at my wang" system. that isn't so bad in and of itself. some people measure their self worth by material possessions, money,etc..BUT
sound was underwhelming. the bass is nondescript/muddy, the source localization is not at all precise, etc
and so it goes with pretty much every "hifi" brand ive ever heard. they tend to ignore well established principles/science in favor of the mystical.
exceptions ive found are ATC, Adam, PMC, B+W, and others who not only serve the Hifi community but the pro audio folks as well(they tend not to suffer BS/magick gladly)
one of my good friends, a vet in Hawaii, owns an all mbl system, cabling is all synergistic research and MIT. he upgrades every year or something stupid.
a classic "im wealthy look at my wang" system. that isn't so bad in and of itself. some people measure their self worth by material possessions, money,etc..BUT
sound was underwhelming. the bass is nondescript/muddy, the source localization is not at all precise, etc
and so it goes with pretty much every "hifi" brand ive ever heard. they tend to ignore well established principles/science in favor of the mystical.
exceptions ive found are ATC, Adam, PMC, B+W, and others who not only serve the Hifi community but the pro audio folks as well(they tend not to suffer BS/magick gladly)