A pic from yesterday's tootle:
THAT is a beautiful bike.
This bike ended it's days in the side of a nissan micra, how did you know?
I love sports bikes but as I get older my wrists just cant take the gip when going slowly. at speed they are lovely.
This bike ended it's days in the side of a nissan micra, how did you know?
Best Bike you never owned?
RC30, no question. I was a motorbike salesman in one of Hull's bike shops when it came out. It was on a massive plinth in front of our desks. We spent weeks staring at that thing. Eventually I rode one up and down a short road in 2000. That was enough. It still mesmerises.
Best Bike you never owned?
How about this one; Triumph 500 speed twin - bought for 50 quid by a mate just after he passed his test back in the 70s. He moved on to a Honda 500/4 and I was offered the Triumph for the price he paid. What a fool I was for not breaking his arm for it. Wonder what it would be worth now?
Looked like this -
Mr Tibbs
That's a shame, were you OK? I bought a Mk 3 350 in 1973; it was a lovely bike but had a few flaws. Speedo used to go backwards over about 75-80mph, rear light bulbs broke with monotonous regularity, headlight was a joke and its ignition switch had to be kept away from water. On the other hand it handled impeccably, made a glorious noise and made every other bike I tried that year look like a joke for one reason or another. Yes 500 Kawasaki's did have strange/challenging handling; Honda 750 4's seemed like porky pigs and Suzuki 750's like they were hinged in the middle.
Except from the front they look like these: http://slacks-creek.australialisted...honda-cbr1000f-1000cc-nbsp-1988_17250939.html
Can be a problem. My last bike was a Suzuki RF 900, I guess you'd class it as a sports-tourer, not exactly radical.
My right wrist would go numb if I had to ride it at speeds less than that required to balance the weight on my arms, for any length of time.
In the USA, the popular fix was a Corbin seat and some higher bars. Thus equipped, the RF would be hard to criticize, except maybe for being another boring UJM!
the types that ride the sports/plastic bikes here, are, in every case i've seen, enormous douchebags. and i just dont like the damned things. they are too twitchy and horribly uncomfortable.
i enjoy riding very long distances, to clear my head, to get writing ideas and get the wind in my face, sunshine. i dont ride to show off or fly around hairpin turns. it simply does not interest me.
for the times I do want speed, my Intruder has more than enough for me. when I combine that with the sound, the looks, and the comfort.. ..the combination facilitates attainment of a mindset that I find very appealing..addictive even.
a sports bike just does not inspire that sort of "walkabout on two wheels" feeling. Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance wouldnt work on a damn aprilia or ducati., you know? nor would it on easy rider. but the cb77 superhawk and the harley panhead.. yes
im very philosophical about these things. sportsbikes conjur up a certain feeling that I find revolting, and counter to what motorcycle riding means/is to me.
Definitely a good rider - went on to do well in the Aprilia 250 challenge series but unfortunately had to stop racing after a spine injury. I think the big Bandit was near enough standard apart from the obligatory loud exhaust. Just one of those guys who could go fast on anything. Well, not on a Harley obviously
Not that I have anything against Harley ownership - I'd have one for pottering about on a lazy Sunday afternoon if spare cash and garage space allowed (that and at least half a dozen other bikes I can think of ATM).
Ha! A quote that should have been written into every Kawasaki 500 owners handbook.
Mr Tibbs
What does?