Even more sinister. And not being reported accurately at all by our beloved broadcasters.I don't think the Palestinians in Rafa can just pack their bags and leave.
There ae 1.4 million Palestinians in Rafa. They are all being required to stay there by the IDF, apart from 100,000 who have been vetted and ordered to move to a safe zone.
I've been thinking about this myself, and I think there are two aspects.Here’s what I don’t get. Simple bloke that I am obviously. If you telegraph intentions for several weeks e.g. Rafah about a specialist counterterrorism operation and then step up activities ordering everyone to leave the vicinity what exactly, other than the territory, is the point? The terrorists aren’t going to hang around with labels on waiting to be picked off. They left with everyone else. It’s a total sham.
What am I missing?
Where do you get that idea from? My thought is that any attempt to take out Hamas members more "surgically" would result in more deaths of Israeli soldiers in hand to hand fighting, which they won't accept. So better from their point of view to bombard it from the air. Giving some Palestinians a safe pass out makes good PR.I've been thinking about this myself, and I think there are two aspects.
A) The Israelis would. . . would prefer not to cause unnecessary civilian casualties to do so.
Tunnels? Hamas equivalent of WMD. And about as real. Not sure why only 100k civilians can leave though? Assuming the earlier post is accurate.I've been thinking about this myself, and I think there are two aspects.
A) The Israelis would like to get the hostages back and they are presumably in tunnels under Rafah with Hamas people, but they would prefer not to cause unnecessary civilian casualties to do so.
B) The planning of the Rafah operation has been part of the horse trading with Hamas, Qatar, Egypt, US, etc. In other words "give us back the hostages and we won't attack Rafah." Obviously more complicated, given the many conditions and demands being made by all sides to call a ceasefire.
Well it may be more than 100K -- I noticed The Guardian is suggesting 150,000 now. Maybe someone has access to the real picture.Tunnels? Hamas equivalent of WMD. And about as real. Not sure why only 100k civilians can leave though? Assuming the earlier post is accurate.
I have no truck with the bad faith bargaining going on.
Or Hancock's half hour."Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton" sounds like something off Trumpton!
The Biden administration’s analysis of Israel’s war in Gaza has not proceeded as a good faith effort to uphold US law.
Our response to the Biden report on Israel's war in Gaza:https://t.co/CGKHpqfGvU
— Doctors w/o Borders (@MSF_USA) May 12, 2024
The other objective is to murder as many Palestinians as possible. Including women (fewer Palestinians in future) and children (the next generation). It is beyond horrific. Certainly worse than Putin in Ukraine.The population displacements- they are not evacuations, are window dressing, they will flatten the city district by district.
Dont forget the broader aim of Israel is to render Gaza uninhabitable and to hell with the hostages- Christ they have a doctrine to shoot their own people When taken hostage.
My brother described it in terms which are quite horrible but hard to argue against - an organised cull.The other objective is to murder as many Palestinians as possible. Including women (fewer Palestinians in future) and children (the next generation). It is beyond horrific. Certainly worse than Putin in Ukraine.