Einstein used his brain. That's rather different than usb cables, even the fancy ones.If Einstein had just sat back and taken the Newton's pronouncements as an immutable truth he'd have made less progress than he did, don't you think?
Einstein used his brain. That's rather different than usb cables, even the fancy ones.If Einstein had just sat back and taken the Newton's pronouncements as an immutable truth he'd have made less progress than he did, don't you think?
Einstein used his brain. That's rather different than usb cables, even the fancy ones.
I've not been too vocal in DAC threads because I wouldn't hold as strong an opinion on them as I would on digital cables. FWIW, I agree with the likes of Keith and others that say once properly designed, there really shouldn't be much difference between them.Max, perhaps I picked the wrong fight - but whereas I'd be staggered to hear a difference in a digital cable, I'd be less so on things like DACs which as far as I can work out you still assert are all the same unless broken, or voiced for particular effect. And yes, I'll be writing up what we find on this.
But 72% either know or attest to the fact they don't make a difference.That's not the least of such a poll's troubles: mainly the sample size is much too small to be meaningful.
But even if it's only a microcosm snapshot it does suggest that a third of PFM members - not just a weird outlier cult - who've tried USB cables found they made a difference. I think it would be rude to call them crazy: it's not that small a minority.
PS: In fact, the figure currently stands at 40%.
DAC[...] once properly designed, [] really shouldn't be much difference between them.
Zackly, and Archimago's non-audible measurement differences become night and day, veil removing sonics that a deaf man would hearOne audiophile's "not much difference" is another's revelation.
Heavens above! Drinks all round, you've shown a glimpse of doubt about something. Welcome to our club mate.there really shouldn't be much difference between them.
Heavens above! Drinks all round, you've shown a glimpse of doubt about something. Welcome to our club mate.
It's worth baring in mind that the Foosters mission is to get people listening to these things as much as possible so that expectation bias is given it's opportunity. This is why item keeps droning on about home demos, which while a good idea with a lot of things, is a pointless exercise with many other things, especially cables, though perhaps not DACs as much.
This conversation expanding will do you no favours.The point of a home loan is that it's the only way to decide anything about anything - particularly speakers. I can't think of a fairer way to offer customer service.
It's even try before buy: not a 'money back' scam. If it's not good enough to keep, send it back. If it's good, buy it. I'm totally prepared for the product to speak for me - even USB cables.
Quite a risk if it's all foo, isn't it?
Wrong on so many levels . . . you're defining 'disposition to belief' as gullibility which is contra-indicated by a willingness to experiment and change viewpoint on the basis of evidence and experience.
The prejudice against digital cables - or, charitably, over-reliance on theory - makes people lazy about doing their own 'research'.
Without the background of reality, of course such a tiny ad-hoc poll could be statistically interpreted in any number of ways. As a snapshot of PFM sentiment the inferences are unambiguous.
A perfectly sensible position. Well said.I am utterly pragmatic regarding cables. When i can hear a difference blind, and it's an improvement I'll buy it. Until anyone can prove a difference blind I'll chose to err on the side of differences not existing. It's a purely logical stance and open to change under weight of evidence at any time.
You see that really is the difference between you and me. I have no dog in this fight at all. I am utterly pragmatic regarding cables. When i can hear a difference blind, and it's an improvement I'll buy it. Until anyone can prove a difference blind I'll chose to err on the side of differences not existing. It's a purely logical stance and open to change under weight of evidence at any time.
Your stance is not only illogical, it's flat contradictory: your views and purchases are based on whether you can hear a positive difference - so not about the 'weight of evidence' at all.
Blind tests have shown subjects unable to differentiate between amplifiers - you don't believe amplifiers differ, either?
You're actually not that different from most of us: you're a pragmatic subjectivist. You're just a bit louder than average.