Timcat
pfm Member
I had Arcs for about 7-8 years, then Obelisks for about the same number of years. They were driven by an olive Naim 250, then by a black 250. I found the Arcs very enjoyable. The Obs were better in most respects, but I always had nagging doubts over the 'sting' or slightly harsh edge from their metal dome tweeters. When I heard a pair of ATC SCM 40s, the sting disappeared and voices, particularly female, suddenly sounded more real. The imaging improved immensely and everything sounded more accurate. I bought the ATCs and the Obs soldiered on in a second, then little used, system. The Obs were eventually replaced by B&W 804D3s, which I think are far more accurate, much better in the vocal range and way better at imaging.
Basically, I think that the Obs were voiced for use with orchestral music, but were not that accurate and that this showed with solo singers and more simple pieces. I also don't know why they stayed with their harsh metal dome tweeters.
Just my opinion of course and (tweeters apart) one that could also be influenced by the rooms in which the speakers were used. I have always found that speakers must match room acoustics and that the same speaker can sound awful in one room and great in another.
Basically, I think that the Obs were voiced for use with orchestral music, but were not that accurate and that this showed with solo singers and more simple pieces. I also don't know why they stayed with their harsh metal dome tweeters.
Just my opinion of course and (tweeters apart) one that could also be influenced by the rooms in which the speakers were used. I have always found that speakers must match room acoustics and that the same speaker can sound awful in one room and great in another.