1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Rooms, Speakers, and EQ Curves

Discussion in 'audio' started by mercalia, Mar 20, 2017.

  1. mercalia

    mercalia pfm Member

    "Paul Hales, founder of Pro Audio Technology, talks about room correction—or as he prefers to call it, room compensation. Topics include some of his fundamental principles of room EQ, sound directivity from various objects such as violins and speakers, how microphones do not capture sound in the same way that human ears do, how sound interacts with small to medium-sized rooms, target response curves (including the X-curve), how conforming to the X-curve causes the sound to be louder and more harsh than it should be, his suggested modification to the X-curve, answers to chat-room questions, and more."

    interesting podcast - Pauls Hales take is that we live and move in rooms where we hear live music and sounds so rooms are not a hindrance to hifi ( get the earphones out? no ) but part of the experience as they would be in a live concert. He cites the example of how terrible a violin can sound close to without the support of the room where it is being played.


    or down load video
  2. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    Thanks for posting, thought it was an informative vid. My target curve is very similar to the modified X and Harman target curves with a bass boost and de-attenuated flattish mid range. I find its very relaxing and enjoyable at low listening levels giving you head room when you want to whack the volume up.

    Unfortunately I don't think many on here seem to use EQ. They prefer to use exotic power chords, speaker wire and interconnects to tune their systems. :)
  3. manicatel

    manicatel pfm Member

    Room correction EQ etc can have a massive affect on a systems SQ.
    I link it very closely with acoustic treatment panels, bass traps etc.
    Far more cost-effective than trying to get cables, stands & suports to "fine tune" a system.
    The potential downside with room treatment, room EQ etc, is that it is FAR too easy to over-do it, resulting in a flat, dull, boring sound, even though these systems tell the user that its giving a neutral line.
    Whilst Neutral can be seen as correct, it doesn't necessarily come over as sounding good.
  4. Hifi_swlon

    Hifi_swlon pfm Member

    Quite a few people I've interacted with do. And I do.

    I guess if you have a streaming front end and some digital components, and have tried decent solutions like Dirac or Acourate, rather than basic PEQ (which I also use with care) then you'll embrace it once you hear the results.

    I learnt the hard way that messing with subtle EQ by changing cables is an expensive fools game. I'm convinced the only difference between exotic cables is a very slightly different frequency response, which gives the effect of a noticeable change to 'detail' or whatever. You can do the same in an instant with EQ, and actually get the sound you want.

    I really think modern 64 bit floating point math for audio processing is transparent, or certainly is relative to the gain you get. There are limits like everything, but it's amazing the difference.

    Dirac was the most obvious upgrade I ever had.

    But measuring etc isn't for everyone, especially if you have multiple sources and like swapping speakers around etc.
  5. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    Yes, EQ can certainly go horribly wrong and should only be administered with due regard to the constraints of a system. I avoid boosting frequencies except the bass whereby using subs gives me a lot of headroom. Everything else is de-attenuated to achieve my desired response.

    I agree, a flat curve is very dull and small changes can have a significant impact, both negative and positive. Its made a massive improvement to my system and I'd never be without it. Its a shame so many audiophiles can't get over the phobia of sticking an equaliser or DSP in the signal path as they'd be amazed by what their systems are capable of sounding like. For those with Roon, the new DSP feature is excellent and well worth experimenting with.
  6. Michael J

    Michael J CDP3000 1Hz-20kHz ±0.5dB

    What does "de-attenuated" mean?
  7. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    It means nothing. I meant Attenuate, but I think you probably knew that.
  8. Rodney gold

    Rodney gold Im just me...

    I tried to replicate my DIRAC correction using the roon parametric with quite impressive results .. wasnt as good as DIRAC but a damn sight better than nothing.
    The DSP engine in roon is awesome
  9. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    I'm sure they do, I was just having a dig at the cable threads which seem to be far more prevalent on PFM.

    I use Dirac too but like PEQ its a learning curve and very easy to get horribly wrong. Poorly positioned measurements and overdriving the speakers will yield terrible results. Get it right however and I think its possibly one of the biggest upgrades you can make, albeit confined to a listening area.
  10. MattSPL

    MattSPL pfm Member

    Any frequency plots to share after EQ? I'm in the process of EQing my own setup.
  11. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    Yep, its very impressive, especially as its the first iteration with hopefully more to come.
  12. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    If I had any you'd be welcome but I deleted them when I left my MBP with the Apple store last month to have a new logic board fitted! Thought I'd backed everything up to an external drive then deleted All Files and Trash forgetting Dirac projects and REW measurements were stored in a VM Fusion Windows 10 session, which was deleted :mad: I haven't bothered redoing the Dirac measurements yet because I can still use the filters in my MiniDSP.

    In any event, post Dirac measurements are difficult because you really need to take 9 measurements using REW from the exact same position you took the original Dirac measurements, to give you an accurate idea of the FR correction. I once took a few random REW measurements of Dirac on/off across the listening position and each measurement with Dirac enabled shifted FR closer to the target curve. Of course the SQ is totally dependant on the measurements you took and what you are asking Dirac to correct. As with any EQ, you also need to be sympathetic to your speakers limitations. A visually pleasing FR does not necessarily equate to good SQ.

    Roon doesn't have a measurement function yet but I think its possible to record the REW test tone then play it through Roon, which should allow you to measure Roon's EQ. I haven't tried this yet but I'd be interested to see the results and happy to share.
  13. MattSPL

    MattSPL pfm Member

    Ok thanks, I'll try and post some plots later.
  14. GJO

    GJO pfm Member

    Same here,mine is set for a sofa,there is now a very defined hot spot in the middle of said sofa,have tried setting the mike further apart,but this didn't make much difference.

    I did define my own curves and made maybe a dozen different files,but always resort back the the default optimised setting.

    Several friends have/are now going down the same route and they like me are diehard vinyl users,I went for the minidspdirac 22a,improved my system by quite some margin now the bottom end is under control.
  15. tuga

    tuga pfm Member

    Thanks for the link.

    I just wish the host would stop interrupting and that creepy laugh...

  16. mercalia

    mercalia pfm Member

    yes Father Christmas and his laugh - It used to freak me out but I must have got used to it. The podcast has a live element with irc and I suppose he has to keep them happy also. As mentioned they did a companion piece some time ago. I am glad some here have found the podcast interesting. Twit TV has a number of interesting podcasts ( why oh why call it Twit TV. maybe I dont get it but "Twit" in the UK is an insult? )
  17. windhoek

    windhoek pfm Member

    I just watched the podcast and what seemed like a useful idea was measuring near-field as well as listening position to see how the direct sound compares/ contrasts with the room sound.

    And I know what he means when he says some cinemas are simply too loud when playing adverts, trailers and films. The modified X curve seems like the way to go to tame the overall sound.
  18. sunbeamgls

    sunbeamgls pfm Member

    Sad geeky but true answer: the network of podcasts was started by Leo Laporte on the back of his "This Week in Tech" radio show / podcast.
  19. mercalia

    mercalia pfm Member

    So Paul Hales returns to give a second look at sound science where he openly admits that sound science is in its early stages and still is inhabited by myths

    "With so much more to discuss than we could get to last week, host Scott Wilkinson continues his conversation with Paul Hales, founder of Pro Audio Technology. This week, he explains why he believes that audio science is relatively unrefined, leading to lots of dogma, misinformation, uncertainty, and inconsistency. Next, we dive into immersive-audio systems, including the importance of multiple subs, sophisticated bass management, and speaker directivity. Also, we talk about measuring sound pressure levels, answers to chatroom questions, and more."

    download the podcast -
  20. Paulie

    Paulie Member

    Interesting thread and listen.

    Here's a question: Do any readers here give much credibility to the Bang and Olufsen "sound lens" technology? I went to a demo once, and have read about it, and they maintain that the technology allows the lens on top of their high end speakers scans the room (with a radar like system) and calibrates the speaker accordingly. It, supposedly, takes in and accounts for room dimensions, furniture and so on.

    I know their kit is more for aesthetics and not generally given much credibility with audiophiles - but it seems like an interesting approach to take rather than an external EQ.

Share This Page