1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Room Correction with coax input/output

Discussion in 'audio' started by thebiglebowski, Sep 10, 2017.

  1. Julf

    Julf Evil brother of Mark V Shaney

    No, but a $300 DSP box probably can.
     
  2. GJO

    GJO pfm Member

    +1 works great for me.
     
  3. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    If your speakers are active and you can time align drivers, then possibly $300 can do it to a point with lots of measurements and manual configuration. You'll only get a four channel solution from MiniDSP for that money however.
     
  4. BilliumB

    BilliumB pfm Member

    Did it end up at £780 inc all import costs?

    Cheers. Bill
     
  5. thebiglebowski

    thebiglebowski pfm Member

    Haven't had the invoice from customs yet, used my company to clear it so didn't have to pay up front.

    It was £650 so I'm expecting 20% VAT to go on top as there's no duty on electronic recording devices which this is classed as.
     
  6. Rodney gold

    Rodney gold Im just me...

  7. GJO

    GJO pfm Member

  8. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    The 22D is a digital only device which has switching regulators in the power supply path. Without any analogue circuitry to worry about, its highly remote a battery or linear PSU will make any difference, unless the stock SMPS is affecting other kit in your system.

    I just use the supplied wall wart on mine but in the interests of open mindedness and curiosity, I've just tried it with a Teddy Pardo linear PSU and can't detect any difference. Then again, it was sighted and my expectation bias works the other way round these days ;)
     
  9. GJO

    GJO pfm Member

    Mines a 22A
     
  10. DNM

    DNM pfm Member

    Then that has an ADC and DAC, quite different to the product the OP purchased.
     
  11. igor_xxxx

    igor_xxxx pfm Member

    It looks like I need to give Dirac a try one more time.Two times I tried it with the recommended curve and somehow it sounded strange and different to me, so I simply turned it off without too much messing with it.
     
  12. darrenyeats

    darrenyeats pfm Member

  13. thebiglebowski

    thebiglebowski pfm Member

    Have no idea what "numerically blameless" is but you are over analysing this.

    I tried it with the filter active and then switched off, for me it sounded better with the filter on.

    Job done.
     
  14. darrenyeats

    darrenyeats pfm Member

    Wouldn't be the first time!

    I used to be a raging subjectivist for years. Then years of being a raging objectivist. Since I started my latest phase of over-analyzing and being OTT with matters hi-fi a few years ago (semi-objectivist, semi-subjectivist, or schizophrenic) I've achieved much better sound - maybe it's not so bad.
     
  15. SteveS1

    SteveS1 I heard that, pardon?

    Absolutely. Care is needed with getting the measurements right but I've yet to hear 'no filter' perform better than a filter in any of about seven or eight rooms I've tried it in. Being a bit OCD, I made three sets of measurements for my own room and went for the one I preferred although they were very close and all were much better than 'no filter'.

    Interestingly I have not been able to improve on the default curve although some report fine tuning to be beneficial. I lost interest in fiddling because I was enjoying it and no longer distracted by obvious room effects.
     

Share This Page