1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Where we are now: The site is back up and running! The character set encoding issue has been fixed so old posts should now look ok. I am currently working on themes/skins etc and I will be deleting the temporary green skin very soon as it has many issues. I will do a very quick variation on the stock blue skin first just to get a light-grey background and san-serif font, and I will set this as default. Later this week I will hopefully add a professional third-party skin in pfm colours (life is way too short to do this crap myself, and I've found one I really like than needs next to no tweaking). We are getting there slowly...
    Dismiss Notice
  3. May I please request people check and update their email address if it is out if date. I ask as I’m getting countless bounce errors as the server fails to send notifications through etc. I’ll eventually figure out how to send these to a black hole somewhere, but it makes sense to address it at source as quite a few folk are obviously not getting the thread and conversations notifications they have set in their preferences.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

Good buy or not..

Discussion in 'photo' started by robs, May 22, 2008.

  1. robs

    robs pfm Member

  2. vuk

    vuk \o/ choose anarchy

    it's a zoom lens, the speed is not constant, it doesn't appear to have an aperture ring and it's from a second-rate company. typically, camera/lens reviews are as bad as audio reviews in terms of uncalled for praise. i would say pass on this.

  3. Mousey

    Mousey pfm Member

    Why not have a look here http://www.pbase.com/cameras/sigma/17-35_28-4_ex_dg_asp_hsm and see some of the images taken with this lens. Looks ok to me, especially considering the price. Canon do an el-cheapo 18-55 for a similar amount, so it might be worth comparing the two.

    FWIW I don't consider Sigma to be second rate. Their attitude to their customers in particular is way beyond anything I've experienced with Nikon. I've used several of their lenses recently (12-24, 120-300 2.8, 500 4.0) and had nothing but good results from them.

    Hope this helps.

  4. Cesare

    Cesare pfm Member

    If I were you, and was looking for a Canon compatible lens for a crop body, i'd look at the Sigma 18-50 EX 2.8. It's really rather fine. Try here for second hand gear:


    They have a couple of second hand ones at present.

    I've bought various bits from them over the years and have always been satisfied with their description of the items. Best dealt with over the phone.


Share This Page