Having ordered a couple of 100uF wet tants, I now understand that Naim used two 47uf in parallel to reduce the chance of failure.
CAn anybody please advise what the implications of failure are? Totalling my speakers is not a preferred option!
thanks
Tants usually fail short circuit so putting two in parallel will double the chance of failure!
Failure would likely mean a volt or two of DC fed to the speaker. Not enough to harm them.
Just to add my experience a couple of days ago:-
The dc offset has always high on one of my NAPA boards at 180mv but I judged it as not damaging and it sounded OK
I retested it after being reminded by this thread and it was 500mv ie potentially damaging
To me this usually means I have to find someone to repair it not easy
I took the capacitors out and tested them, one of the paralleled pair of 47uf feedback was dead (zero capacitance) surprise
Without much hope I replaced the pair with AVX FFB and hey presto offset 10mv!
Interesting- I had not thought that through... Any idea why Naim changed from a single to parallelled caps then?
Or what's good for an amplifier feedback position isn't necessarily good for signal path coupling?
Perhaps some wet tants are better than others?
Although it is on record that I'm no fan of Naim amps, I can of course repair them and all other makes... So unless you're outside of the UK you've found someone to do repairs
The offset is from the same issue that would result in a Volt or two if they failed short. In this case they are leaky....
Although it is on record that I'm no fan of Naim amps, I can of course repair them and all other makes... So unless you're outside of the UK you've found someone to do repairs
There is no good technical reason, in this context, as to why two have been used in parallel. It may well be down to two smaller ones being cheaper than one big 'un! Especially if they already stock large quantities of the smaller ones.