Mike Hanson
Trying to understand...
Earlier this year I acquired the Klipsch Cornwall IV, which I think is utterly fantastic. It does virtually everything well, but in particular is astonishingly fast, dynamic and rhythmic--all those PRaT things that make music exciting and engaging. It also sounds great at both low and high volumes, which is critically important to me--Not everyone in my household likes music as much as I do, and I want to be entertained, even when I have to be considerate of others.
I've heard many systems and speakers throughout the years, and there are many test tracks that I've become intimately familiar with. I've developed a strong sense of how they sound on a really good system. Against this internal benchmark, one could say the Cornwall is missing hint of richness, and the tonal balance is slightly off. It never sounds anything other than wonderful, but I occasionally feel like it could sound better.
I just got an opportunity to audition the Tannoy Kensington SE in my home. It retailed for substantially more than the Cornwall, so I was curious to see what it might offer. I'll get to the point and say that the tonal richness that I felt was lacking in the Cornwall was fully present in the Kensington. It's a great sounding speaker!
If the Kensington could also do that the Cornwall manages so well, then I would not be penning this missive. Unfortunately, though it sounds very impressive, it does so only at high volumes. Even then, it's no where near as fast, dynamic, and room-energizing as the Cornwall. And at low volumes, it sounds positively recessed and unengaging, verging on dull and ignorable.
Unfortunately, these shortcomings are a dealbreaker for me. There are things I very much like about the Kensington, but the Cornwall is a better match for my desires, on the whole.
That does make me wonder if there's any possibility of a speaker that would better the Cornwall, given my very specific criteria:
I've heard many systems and speakers throughout the years, and there are many test tracks that I've become intimately familiar with. I've developed a strong sense of how they sound on a really good system. Against this internal benchmark, one could say the Cornwall is missing hint of richness, and the tonal balance is slightly off. It never sounds anything other than wonderful, but I occasionally feel like it could sound better.
I just got an opportunity to audition the Tannoy Kensington SE in my home. It retailed for substantially more than the Cornwall, so I was curious to see what it might offer. I'll get to the point and say that the tonal richness that I felt was lacking in the Cornwall was fully present in the Kensington. It's a great sounding speaker!
If the Kensington could also do that the Cornwall manages so well, then I would not be penning this missive. Unfortunately, though it sounds very impressive, it does so only at high volumes. Even then, it's no where near as fast, dynamic, and room-energizing as the Cornwall. And at low volumes, it sounds positively recessed and unengaging, verging on dull and ignorable.
Unfortunately, these shortcomings are a dealbreaker for me. There are things I very much like about the Kensington, but the Cornwall is a better match for my desires, on the whole.
That does make me wonder if there's any possibility of a speaker that would better the Cornwall, given my very specific criteria:
- Fast and dynamic (PRaT)
- Large sense of scale
- Bass extension down to 30Hz (-6dB)
- Tonally balanced and rich, with sufficient high frequency extension for that "sparkle"
- Engaging at low and high volumes
- Works close to the wall (which probably eliminates planar and open baffle options, and anything with a rear port)
- Not larger than the Cornwall (which is already stupidly large)
- Grills to protect the drivers
- Natural wood appearance (no black, nor polished paints)
- Not too expensive (e.g. the MSRP of the current Kensington GR is double what I'm willing to spend.)