Tony L
Administrator
The reason for the wholesale adoption of the Linn GIGO near religion was that at that time amplifiers were pretty technically competent, but the beginning and the end of the reproduction chain could add significant amounts of distortion, or just simply lose information.
Plus, at the start, Linn only made a source component. You can find a “reverse GIGO” argument from say Harbeth, who only make loudspeakers! ;-)
With analogue replay you clearly need high quality mechanical engineering. A cheap record player is almost without exception a bad record player, so Linn’s argument holds a fair amount of water. I felt it was taken to extremes though as compromising on the loudspeaker is never a sensible idea. Again good sound takes proper mechanical engineering. To my mind the area most able to be compromised is the amplifier as it is very well established technology and assuming a sensibly designed and efficient loudspeaker shouldn’t be asked to move mountains with crazy current or Watts. If I were selling the flat-earth ideology with 20/20 hindsight I’d go ‘mid-light’ every time, e.g. LP12, A60, BC1s or equivalent over say LP12, 32/Snaps/110 and something hopelessly compromised like say Wharfedale Diamonds. Nice amps needn’t cost the earth.