Seanm
pfm Member
They’re a very engaging pair.I thought the new doc was excellent.’tbe worst bits were the talking heads but thankfully most of it was the PSBs.
They’re a very engaging pair.I thought the new doc was excellent.’tbe worst bits were the talking heads but thankfully most of it was the PSBs.
In the late eighties and early to mid-nineties, we had the Late Show (or was it Late Review?) on BBC2, after Newsnight. A whole range of genuinely new and interesting music turned up on this - including Portishead, and their unlamented imitators Salad.
There were lots of interesting presenters on this - including Miranda Sawyer, and, weirdly, Alison Pearson, now doyenne of the conspiracist right.
I always thought Miranda had a certain admirable edge.
<moderating>
I’ve changed the thread title as it just grates whenever I see it. I’m sure it wasn’t intended in such a way, but I read it as misogynistic click-bait. I’m just not comfortable with it on pfm.
Lets hope he didn't pick up any showbiz 'habits'.Somewhat oddly, Michael Gove also turned up on some episodes.
I’m not an expert on Joy Division, far from it, but wasn’t their ‘fame’ largely posthumous?
I think I’m a similar age to Miranda Sawyer & can remember people at 6th form who were really in to them, some younger than me.
Can you only be an ‘expert’ if you alive when said subject was in their pomp?
I can think of a few examples which would contradict this viewpoint.
Miranda Sawyer wasn't even a teenager when Joy Division emerged...
...but even so she seems to have lots of personal experiences of the band for a 12 year old from a public school.
I don’t think that is a good argument. It is the equivalent of saying I have no right to discuss Krautrock, prog, punk, jazz etc. I just wasn’t there. How many talking heads on a Beatles documentary were there? Most who turn up on such things are the likes of Oasis and others of generations later. It is just the nature of this sort of programming.
MmmTo be fair I am exactly the same age as Miranda (born 1967) and actually bought "Unknown Pleasures" on release...
...but still wouldn't feel qualified to judge them (live especially). New Order is perhaps different as a I saw them live circa 1986.
Mmm
How do classical critics cope then? What about Jazz, most of the key protagonists are long gone. Countless books on the Beatles etc.
Bit of a daft argument, sorry.
In what way are you more qualified?Yes but it depends how qualified she sounds.
I have followed Joy Division from the age of 12 (like Miranda)...
...but most of her observartions seem cretonous to me.
TBF to Elbow, like Pulp, put in the hard yards before finding fame. Give me Jarvis on the radio everytime though. I'm ambivalent towards Elbow but I have to say when I saw them live Garvey had the crowd at the O2 in the palm of his hand and I thought they were fantastic live. I just never reach for them at home.I find Elbow incredibly boring. His radio show is OK. Let’s be honest though, he’s massively winning at life.
It's not at all inexplicable that Sawyer appeared on the Pet Shop Boys documentary. She worked at Smash Hits a few years after Tennant (so was able to comment on SH's style of music journalism) and also has a long history of interviewing and working with the duo.Constantly during the late 80s and 90s Miranda Sawyer's name would pop up in New Order docs...
...tonight I am watching the BBC Imagine programme on The Pet Shop Boys - again inexplicably we have Miranda Sawyer contributing nothing.
It’s amazing how quickly things moved on after his death. I’m nearly 53 so they passed me by completely.Just to chime in I thought the PSB documentary was excellent overall. Neil and Chris are always worth listening to as they are clearly intelligent and still grounded, they also discuss a lot of topics most bands wouldn't even think about. I'm a huge fan of their music which I know many dismiss as lightweight synthpop nonsense, but lyrically they are very clever and they are still here making new music 40 years after they started... not many bands can say that. As for Miranda she seems to be a competent journalist with a genuine love of music and if she is prone to a bit of exaggeration every now and then over her own personal experiences so what? Her contributions to the documentary, while not crucial to it, did add some useful reaction commentary to the duo's career.
@Woodface I am 59 and the second band I ever saw live was Joy Division, I sneaked off at the tender age of 14 to watch them in London. While they certainly became elevated to the almost mythical status they are held in today in many people's minds after Curtis's death and New Order's success, there was a huge buzz around them when I saw them and anyone who was anyone was clamouring for a piece of them. While they are one of my favourite bands (I only went to uni in Manchester because of Factory Records, much to my parents' dismay) I wonder how their career might have progressed had Ian not have died... Peter Hook talks about how they felt they need to do something different to emerge from the shadow of Ian and put his passing behind them when they became New Order and they got into the underground electronic music scene and the rest is history... maybe there would have been no Blue Monday and the world of electronic dance music wold have been very different.