Lee T
pfm Member
Thanks for all the response, very enlightening, i may give it a go as i could recoup funds if not suitable & i'm pretty sure i would not be dissapointed.
Both have been used from new from the same owner which always appeals to me, you at least know both have been looked after equally which is always a bonus in my book.
In response to Joe regarding the remote, send me a pm with postage cost & thanks for the offer btw, if it's not too expensive i will give it a go, why not.
ps/ to really put a spanner in the works i was offered the later i (non itallic models) for £675 including postage, if they are still available i don't know, it was a couple of months back., there are just so many varying views on them, some think the original are better, some think the i models were far superior, my reason for being on the fence.
I had a listen to the i models & thought the amp needed the volume pushing to at least 10 o clock to sound good, at low levels it sounded a little dull i felt, lacking oomph & was hoping the earlier 5 didn't need this.
Both have been used from new from the same owner which always appeals to me, you at least know both have been looked after equally which is always a bonus in my book.
In response to Joe regarding the remote, send me a pm with postage cost & thanks for the offer btw, if it's not too expensive i will give it a go, why not.
ps/ to really put a spanner in the works i was offered the later i (non itallic models) for £675 including postage, if they are still available i don't know, it was a couple of months back., there are just so many varying views on them, some think the original are better, some think the i models were far superior, my reason for being on the fence.
I had a listen to the i models & thought the amp needed the volume pushing to at least 10 o clock to sound good, at low levels it sounded a little dull i felt, lacking oomph & was hoping the earlier 5 didn't need this.