They already areJust this week I’ve waiting in on 3 separate occasions for a BT engineer to turn up to fix a fault with my line that’s effecting my broadband. Every time I phone up customer service, they run a test, tell me I have a fault on my line (nss!) and book an engineer visit, but engineer cancels booking without telling me so I have to phone up again to go round the same circle. I’ve now raised a formal complaint.
Virgin are not an option where I live, but when I was with them in my previous house, they were just as bad
The sooner they’re privatised the better.
I'm perfectly happy for Labour to introduce a progressive tax system to improve public services like the NHS, Welfare provision but this Xmas list is getting farsical. They will be offering free tennis for monkeys next.
I'm perfectly happy for Labour to introduce a progressive tax system to improve public services like the NHS, Welfare provision but this Xmas list is getting farsical. They will be offering free tennis for monkeys next.
I’m not in favour of nationalising everything on principle, but certain services, like railways have demonstrably failed to improve by being privatised, (or semi privatised, or half arsed privatised, or whatever), and it seems to me that if you’re dependant on the land line coming into your property for your connection to the big wide world, and BT has a virtual monopoly for providing that connection but fails in its task, then its not fit for purpose. Wether that would be best done by nationalisation or opening Openreach up to competition, I don’t know.They already are
But seriously do you think nationalisation will make these services run smoother? In contrast Sky offer excellent customer service, are partnering with BBC re their adsmart tech & offer decent deals on broadband.
Nationalising broadband at this stage would be a disaster & an expensive one.
PS Hands up who thinks anyone will be still using any form of wired broadband in 11 years time? Err, nope, me neither.
One of them has actually been costed though!Tories now promise to reverse Beeching
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...pen-railway-lines-closed-1960s-beeching-cuts/
To be honest, Bill Oddies manifesto upthread is more credible that either of the two main parties manifestos!
Tories now promise to reverse Beeching
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politic...pen-railway-lines-closed-1960s-beeching-cuts/
To be honest, Bill Oddies manifesto upthread is more credible that either of the two main parties manifestos!
The same goes for all the main parties as far as I'm concerned. It just makes them look even more ridiculous than they already are, particularly as we all know that most of these promises won't be met.I'm perfectly happy for Labour to introduce a progressive tax system to improve public services like the NHS, Welfare provision but this Xmas list is getting farsical. They will be offering free tennis for monkeys next.
A VCR in every home by 2025!
The rail service has improved since privatisation. Passenger numbers are up since the BR days, massively so, but our rail service still isn't good enough. Ultimately it needs huge levels of investment, especially in the North, but successive govts haven't done this.I’m not in favour of nationalising everything on principle, but certain services, like railways have demonstrably failed to improve by being privatised, (or semi privatised, or half arsed privatised, or whatever), and it seems to me that if you’re dependant on the land line coming into your property for your connection to the big wide world, and BT has a virtual monopoly for providing that connection but fails in its task, then its not fit for purpose. Wether that would be best done by nationalisation or opening Openreach up to competition, I don’t know.
All I know is that my telephone line has massive interference and my broadband drops out a million times a day. If that’s not enough to vote Corbyn, I despair
You are not talking bollocks.Well, they're still using it in Singapore - which seems to be permanently years ahead of us. 4G wouldn't do it as there isn't the bandwidth, so that would mean 5G with a mast every 500 metres or so - not cheap to set up, and maintain, nationwide. There are also issues with 5G being able to penetrate walls - or even glass...
https://www.networkcomputing.com/networking/5g-will-hit-wall-literally-2019
I'm not saying wireless isn't the future, but I don't think that future would happen anytime soon.
This isn't my area of expertise (what is I ask myself?) so feel free to tell me I'm talking bollocks.
The rail service has improved since privatisation......
Check out the thread on sim routers. A month ago we were where you are, now getting 35mps plus for half the cost.I’m not in favour of nationalising everything on principle, but certain services, like railways have demonstrably failed to improve by being privatised, (or semi privatised, or half arsed privatised, or whatever), and it seems to me that if you’re dependant on the land line coming into your property for your connection to the big wide world, and BT has a virtual monopoly for providing that connection but fails in its task, then its not fit for purpose. Wether that would be best done by nationalisation or opening Openreach up to competition, I don’t know.
All I know is that my telephone line has massive interference and my broadband drops out a million times a day. If that’s not enough to vote Corbyn, I despair