Brian
Eating fat, staying slim
I’m not interested in giving you an example of anything, fella.Please give an example of unbiased reporting.
I’m not interested in giving you an example of anything, fella.Please give an example of unbiased reporting.
500 civilians were killed in that campaign (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_bombing_of_Yugoslavia.) compared to the 4600 killed in Ukraine (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine#Casualties_and_humanitarian_impact). That suggests NATO and Russian military planners have a different a different attitude towards civilian populations.
I’m not interested in giving you an example of anything, fella.
So we can't save «Russians being taken in by the propaganda, and being afraid of dissent but it's staggering there are apologists around with access to unbiased reporting.»
Maybe it's time to save you from West propaganda?
Paywalled link so not much use to non subscribers. Sounds like a decent option to give the Ukrainians a boost - CIA operate outside USA not in it, they are not "troops" just advisors/trainers.
Dunno if this is a fake but is in the UK tabloids as a story, but if not fake they really are scraping the barrel for commanders
Why don't you say something about the causes of this? That it was a result of the actions of Yugoslav forces and Yugoslav backed militia in their imperialist, bloodthirsty terror campaign of war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide against ethnic Albanians? You're just full of mendacious, denialist bullshit.Even if we accept much disputed number of only 528 casualties (some reports go up to 2500), your account and conclusions of different attitudes between NATO and Russia are wrong - as you don't take into account the population size which is 1 to 4.5 for Ukraine as well as the duration of the wars - Yugoslavia 78 days (or 2.5 months) vs over 4 months so far in Ukraine. Lastly characters of 2 wars should be taken into account - there were no ground operations in Yugoslavia while war in Ukraine couldn't resemble WW2 more so way more chances that grenades and missiles end in civilian districts.
Actually the comparison is tragic for an apparent democratic and civilized military alliance who openly used a warfare against civilians as a legitimate policy. The ratio of murdered civilians (with all these above taken into account) is not any better than Russians'.
You should accept that no one cares about civilians in modern wars, not even reverend NATO. Given an image of Russian brutality, their numbers in Ukr actually seems pretty low to me. Yes they are barbarians but so you are.
I yet have to see something like this done be Russians. This is where your money went in 1999, guys.
WARNING - EXPLICIT CONTENT
You are an excellent example, just as you are.
You had a point earlier in the war when you were confused and uncertain where the truth was. You had a chance to grow.
But you quickly fell under the comfortable blanket of Russian propaganda and you are now a happy russian boy.
It’s so that Ukrainian snipers will mistake him for a bush,
Your post above is obscene.Even if we accept much disputed number of only 528 casualties (some reports go up to 2500), your account and conclusions of different attitudes between NATO and Russia are wrong - as you don't take into account the population size which is 1 to 4.5 for Ukraine as well as the duration of the wars - Yugoslavia 78 days (or 2.5 months) vs over 4 months so far in Ukraine. Lastly characters of 2 wars should be taken into account - there were no ground operations in Yugoslavia while war in Ukraine couldn't resemble WW2 more so way more chances that grenades and missiles end in civilian districts.
Actually the comparison is tragic for an apparent democratic and civilized military alliance who openly used a warfare against civilians as a legitimate policy. The ratio of murdered civilians (with all these above taken into account) is not any better than Russians'.
You should accept that no one cares about civilians in modern wars, not even reverend NATO. Given an image of Russian brutality, their numbers in Ukr actually seems pretty low to me. Yes they are barbarians but so you are.
I yet have to see something like this done be Russians. This is where your money went in 1999, guys.
WARNING - EXPLICIT CONTENT
Why don't you say something about the causes of this? That it was a result of the actions of Yugoslav forces and Yugoslav backed militia in their imperialist, bloodthirsty terror campaign of war crimes, ethnic cleansing and genocide against ethnic Albanians? You're just full of mendacious, denialist bullshit.
Actually the comparison is tragic for an apparent democratic and civilized military alliance who openly used a warfare against civilians as a legitimate policy.
This is where your money went in 1999, guys.
Please don't. You've spouted more than enough crap.Causes of NATO targeting civilians as an answer to an enemy military targeting civilians?
Man, you've said it all. I don't need to add anything.
Please don't. You've spouted more than enough crap.
And there's the xenophobia again, that's never far from the surface with you. Your transference is so clumsy.Well it doesn't depend on me. It's impossible to stay quiet with so much nationalistic, jingoist stupidities.
But there you are, Boris Johnson's nation.
trying to tell us that it’s ok to be a fascist and a barbarian, murderer and a rapist?
a symbolic death of an Ukrainian married to a Russian wife and their child sent under the rubble by Putin and saved by the Ukrainians.
Sarts is a former high-ranking official of the Latvian Ministry of Defense, and now his Center advises NATO on "the development of narratives and counter-narrative strategies," that is, information policy. So his concern is directly related to his work commitments to NATO.