Trump Part 17

Not sure what any of this means, other than the skank with the eyeliner. All I was attempting to do was answer the question you posted taken from the Finnish headline about sick, violent nations allowing armed militias. And I think the clause in the 2nd amendment (with some state's carry laws), along with america descending from mad kings and priests pretty much covers it. What caused the mental malfeasance in Dac boy remains a mystery.

 

marky.

it was my saturday homage.

 

Ahh, I see. well done then! Might I suggest shoehorning cooter spray or coiling up steaming dookies into next weekend's effort.

 

Ok, I can see your point - apologies then for my misinterpretation that you were making excuses rather than trying to point to what you think is the genesis for this militia mentality.

 

A message from the President of Finland.

https://twitter.com/lvandenassum/status/1180448349075496960

 

https://twitter.com/katebevan/status/1180923247728168962

 

This makes chilling reading. An intelligence officer reports on the loyalties of the armed forces.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/if-tr...where-will-the-military-stand?source=facebook

 

i will impersonate you now, but from a slightly different ideological angle:


don.

i spent a whole minute (or close) reading and just couldn't get past the confusion and misinformation. that said, i agree that it's chilling to have a secret service person attempting to shape public opinion under the guise of journalism.

 

Mention the first item you consider misinformation.

 

I am the President of Finland.

 

He’s bonkers...

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1181232249821388801

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1181232251390042118

 

the article should start with: "here are my anecdotal observations of some worrisome attitudes in the military about trump". instead, we get this leading down the garden path after the introductory paragraphs:

"Recent polling shows that among military veterans, approval ratings for Trump are higher than among the civilian population. In my experience, the support for Donald Trump among a large
segment of the U.S. military is downright cult-like."

the polling, although not cited, is something i can imagine the specifics of. sentence 2 is presented as logical continuation of a scientific finding, yet leaves unclear what "large" and "cult-like" mean or how we can establish the statistical validity of the author's experience. maybe we should have a poll that asks about some of those cult-like things? i don't think the claims are improbable but i have no way of assessing the scope, magnitude or veracity of what the author is saying.

maybe he can go on the jimmy dore show and clarify. that would be interesting.

 

Democratized news and opinion: fun for Likes and giggles, but ultimately equal in veracity with Ivana's moaning.

 

The support for Trump from Veterans is strange considering he dodged the draft...

 

Worryingly mental. In anybody else, you’d suspect self-parody, but DJT doesn’t go that.

 

Yes, a case of facts not being as predicted. There's always a chance of learning something by digging into such things....

 

Jimmy Dore, I assume, meets your high academic standards?

 

It's automatic with no exceptions.

Idiot? Step on every rake.
Boozer? Unexplained bruises.
Troll? Populate block lists.
Military or First Responder? Support republicans.

 

With his great and unmatched wisdom? Do not thank God for President Trump; thank President Trump for being God!