Bas V
pfm Member
I still give it a spin when in the right mood. About 15 minutes gabber at a time is enough these days.
15 mins of gabber can be done. 15 mins of Poing! now that’s a challenge
I still give it a spin when in the right mood. About 15 minutes gabber at a time is enough these days.
Care to elaborate what you mean by curtailed? I still have the same LP12 now and CD sounds much better with Densen B-440XS. I'm not in the UK by the way, so I'm not familiar with the phenomenon to which you refer.That’s because your whole system was curtailed for the LP12. Many made that mistake, believing CD was crap because of their turntable. This phenomenon was particularly acute in the UK… less so elsewhere where the Linn wasn’t so present.
Yes! And the Marantz DA12 and CD12 (or Philips LHH1001+LHH1002).The Sony CDP-R1 and DAS-R1 have to be on the list.
Mignun, must be a territory thing, ive never seen that Hitachi or any player like it.
The LP12s I listened to - I never did get to buying one - were very gentle on the ears, a little dull perhaps. Even with K18!Care to elaborate what you mean by curtailed? I still have the same LP12 now and CD sounds much better with Densen B-440XS. I'm not in the UK by the way, so I'm not familiar with the phenomenon to which you refer.
That’s because your whole system was curtailed for the LP12. Many made that mistake, believing CD was crap because of their turntable. This phenomenon was particularly acute in the UK… less so elsewhere where the Linn wasn’t so present.
I listened to a Rotel 965 and a Marantz 63 back to back for a week. The Ro tel was better. I also had a Denon 1015 that was indistinguishable from the Marantz. A local dealer was doing SOR for a week, I paid for all 3 and returned 2 for refund. We were all happy.I think a Rotel 965BX would slip in here. Not expensive but built like a tank with a great balance of virtues. It has a real honesty. I prefer it to the Marantz CD63 KI SE which was all the rage around this time.it also makes a very good transport.
That may well be the model my pal bought. His dad owned a farm and employed him for the summer of 83 or 84. Mark worked his ears off and had the £600 he needed to buy a CD player. He was the first of us to get one, we were all insanely jealous. It didn't matter that there were only a dozen CD s or so available or that they cost about £13 a go when basic agric labour pay for a 16 yo was £1 an hour. It was the dog's and we all knew that this was the future.Iconic? Not sure. But certainly distinctive for the time. I put forward the Philips CD303 (an example of which I bought in late 1983 and still works):
An enthusiast wielding a modern Audio Precision tester shows that it's not competitive on noise floor but otherwise technically not too shabby at all. The Philips and Sony engineers knew their stuff.
I have a different experience. What I heard at the dealer’s was extremely good. I think it was a full Quad system but I’m not sure. It was a long time ago!I first heard a CD player (early Philips) at a dealer that didn't sell Linn. They sold Meridian, Mission and Pink Triangle amongst others. I thought the CD player sounded shite compared to a PT as well. In fact my memory of the Thorens I had at the time into a Rotel amp was preferable. I suspect it's true that most amps in the early/mid 80s didn't show cd in it's best light but Philips etc must've known the sort of gear that most people would get to hear their products through.
That's almost a communicator from II/III (remember that time the Federation discovered Internet pron and all their communicators suddenly grew...)