There have clearly been after market mods done to the BC1s (just from what I can see capacitors and the internal wiring has been replaced). Unless the person who did them really knew what they were doing, they will likely sound worse than what they did originally.
the spendors seem massively inflated these days - even second hand vintage cost thousands it seems ... what about the Harbeths ... just curious .. seems the hifi press used to really like those??
I hadn’t really noticed that Spendors were massively inflated.
Compared with some speakers they are very affordable.
in the US they seem to go for quite a bit - not at all correlating to other british loudspeakers - and the secondary market seems to be following suit ... http://store.acousticsounds.com/a/28136/Spendor
I wouldn’t have thought they are overpriced in the US of A. They’re not cheap here.
You have to pay for quality...
Good to see they are starting to get the respect they deserve. In pretty much every way they are both more important historically, and better sounding, taking into account their much wider bandwidth and greater loudness potential, than the over priced LS3/5A's.
What made the BC1 midrange so good, the 3kHz crossover means that it is the midbass handling it?
In fact I'm vaguely remembering that he ended up having to pay the BBC a percentage of the profit from the BC1 and this was the main impetus in bringing out the BC2. The argument was over the precise formulation and construction of the cone in the bass/mid driver IIRC....
I suspect the BBC design information that Spencer Hughes used to great effect.