tones
Tones deaf
Is it? I've a particular interest in my particular sod (Ireland), where more and more articles are raising the possibility of reunification in this, the centenary of Partition. This appeared in the Financial Times today:
https://www.ft.com/content/b596905e-9878-433d-9516-181e2432e4ee
I like this quote:
But nationalism has a secret weapon: the Democratic Unionist party. The strategic judgments of the province’s largest party have been among the most consistently witless in recent politics. One Tory MP fumes: “The DUP have done more damage to the Union than the IRA, Sinn Féin and all the nationalist forces combined.”
And of course there's Scotland...
To me, no matter how appealing it seems to nationalists of all stripes, it all seems impractical. Scotland is a small country (5.5 million, only slightly bigger than Ireland's) and it has taken 72 years, plus EEC/EU membership, to bring Ireland from being a relatively poor country to its present status. Scotland would have to start from scratch at a time of falling oil prices, a wait for EU membership, unhappiness from Spain (which doesn't want the Catalans and Basques pulling the same stunt) and a hard border with its biggest trading partner. I do realise that it's hard to suffer the upper-class twit in Downing Street, but the alternative seems a lot worse.
With regard to Ireland, the two bits of the island have drifted apart since Partition, so that there are now substantial differences. The North floats on a sea of British taxpayers' money, which Ireland couldn't hope to match. Ireland also wants three-quarters of a million unwilling Unionists like it wants a hole in the head. However, with the distinct possibility of Michelle O'Neill becoming First Minister at the next Northern election and the Shinners being the biggest political party down south, the well-known human tendency to cut off nose to spite face might come to the fore.
While I would like to see Ireland reunited (and I'm a Northern Prod!) and I sympathise with Scottish aspirations, I can't see that either is practical. What think the Fishies?
https://www.ft.com/content/b596905e-9878-433d-9516-181e2432e4ee
I like this quote:
But nationalism has a secret weapon: the Democratic Unionist party. The strategic judgments of the province’s largest party have been among the most consistently witless in recent politics. One Tory MP fumes: “The DUP have done more damage to the Union than the IRA, Sinn Féin and all the nationalist forces combined.”
And of course there's Scotland...
To me, no matter how appealing it seems to nationalists of all stripes, it all seems impractical. Scotland is a small country (5.5 million, only slightly bigger than Ireland's) and it has taken 72 years, plus EEC/EU membership, to bring Ireland from being a relatively poor country to its present status. Scotland would have to start from scratch at a time of falling oil prices, a wait for EU membership, unhappiness from Spain (which doesn't want the Catalans and Basques pulling the same stunt) and a hard border with its biggest trading partner. I do realise that it's hard to suffer the upper-class twit in Downing Street, but the alternative seems a lot worse.
With regard to Ireland, the two bits of the island have drifted apart since Partition, so that there are now substantial differences. The North floats on a sea of British taxpayers' money, which Ireland couldn't hope to match. Ireland also wants three-quarters of a million unwilling Unionists like it wants a hole in the head. However, with the distinct possibility of Michelle O'Neill becoming First Minister at the next Northern election and the Shinners being the biggest political party down south, the well-known human tendency to cut off nose to spite face might come to the fore.
While I would like to see Ireland reunited (and I'm a Northern Prod!) and I sympathise with Scottish aspirations, I can't see that either is practical. What think the Fishies?