advertisement


The (almost) bi-polar nature of Naim's products and customers . . .

Isn’t it just head banging! A lot of Naim owners I know love their Naim for its portrayal with Rock music.

Can only agree on this. I’m a rock fan and I really enjoy Naim stuff. If I was a fan of Bach cantatas, my choice would be completely different: a little Sugden A21 or vacuum tubes such as a Croft or Leben would be on my shopping list.
 
Bach cantatas sound great and enthusiastic with my Naim CDX2.2. Admittedly I have never liked Naim amps and use an ATC integrated instead
 
Yes, and that should be the end of the thread, but it isn't and it won't be! To make matters worse, now we have yet another Naim thread; oh well, anything that increases the traffic of pfm has got to be a good thing I guess!
On the other hand, I wonder how many people are actually put off posting here, or even from joining the forum in the first place due to all the brand bashing crap. It's hardly a welcoming environment is it? I'm not sure I'd bother asking for help here if I wanted advice about a Naim/Linn system.
 
I don’t really understand the Naim does rock music statement.
My system can rock and cover all musical genres.
It has to as my taste is very eclectic.
Not one bit of Naim resides in my system.
 
I don’t really understand the Naim does rock music statement.
My system can rock and cover all musical genres.
It has to as my taste is very eclectic.
Not one bit of Naim resides in my system.

When will it end? Do you want medal or some such? What is your system so I can pull it apart and tell you how shit I think it is... oh no hang on.. I don't feel any need to do that!!!
 
That’s an assumption. Not everyone including myself would agree.
I think most would agree it has good sound. May not be your taste but for certain genres it is good. Having owned Naim myself in the past it was good with acoustic, pop and rock. But it’s the same for other brands isn’t it? I think some really get wrapped up in the Naim argument and some posts are provocative and vitriolic for the sake of it. Not really about Naim just bait to argue. Not very grown up really. And like a poster said earlier I do wonder why there aren’t other threads about other products that draw such argument. I think it can be contempuous.
 
When will it end? Do you want medal or some such? What is your system so I can pull it apart and tell you how shit I think it is... oh no hang on.. I don't feel any need to do that!!!

It wasn’t a dig at Naim or their owners.
I just fail to see why there is an assumption that other kit can’t do rock etc.
I don’t personally have a problem with what kit people have.
Rock on!
 
It wasn’t a dig at Naim or their owners.
I just fail to see why there is an assumption that other kit can’t do rock etc.
I don’t personally have a problem with what kit people have.
Rock on!

Sorry, it's my new sarcastic way of replying on this thread, I have decided to adopt the persona of the hacked off Naim devotee :D
 
The fact that you are stating that it's a fact that Naim has superb build and reliability, when in fact their track record of the product lasting a lifetime within original specs is relatively poor indicates that "superb build" and "reliability" is not good and anyone thinking that they are has been sucked in by the mystical marketing.

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here? Are you trying to make the point that because capacitors have a finite life span that Naim must be shit?

Or is it more nebulous than that and the inference is that the reason they produced multiple models and revisions of older designs is that they must be shit?

Did EMT only ever make one turntable?

To be fair, very few brands offer the servicability and residuals of Naim. Which other brand of mass produced hifi still services 30 year old models?
 
I don’t really understand the Naim does rock music statement.
My system can rock and cover all musical genres.
On the one hand, if you prefer Naim amps then surely you'll enjoy rock music most via a Naim amp.

However, I suspect that the strengths of Naim amps are very well suited to rock music. When I started getting into vintage Naim, rock music was probably the main beneficiary. But perhaps that says more about my previous amps.

None of this means your amps are not good with rock music. Perhaps they are better!
 
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here? Are you trying to make the point that because capacitors have a finite life span that Naim must be shit?

Or is it more nebulous than that and the inference is that the reason they produced multiple models and revisions of older designs is that they must be shit?

Did EMT only ever make one turntable?

To be fair, very few brands offer the servicability and residuals of Naim. Which other brand of mass produced hifi still services 30 year old models?
I'm making the point that the capacitors in Naim amplifiers have a track record of lasting 10 years before benefitting from replacement.

Whilst there are other brands where the capacitors have a track record of lasting longer.
Some so long that not enough time has elapsed yet for them ever having to be replaced.

Given the choice between 2 amplifiers, where one sounds better than the other and where it also has capacitors that have a track record of lasting longer, I know which of the two I'd rate as having the better internal build quality. And it aint the Naim.

I'd rather own an amplifier that never in my lifetime needed a service, than one which was supposed to get serviced every 10 years that was supported for 30 years.

Residuals for Naim are more a reflection of marketing than of any inherent engineering excellence compared to other brands.

Can you not see the irony in Del monaco saying that it's a "fact" that Naim have "superb build" and" reliability", in the same post that he mentions Naim's "mystical marketing and mythology"? When clearly this superb build and reliability are, to put it diplomatically, debatable?

EMT made at least 5 different major models of turntable in the course of 45 odd years. Your question about EMT wins the Off-topic Question Of The Thread award.
 
All caps have a rated lifetime, Naim just make a point of making sure people know to replace them before the performance tails off, rather than users just getting used to how things sound once past their best. One doesn't complain that valves don't last forever why should caps be any different, Naim have always been upfront about this, no reason why it should upset anyone. Do people cry when their tyres need replacing, no. Does it make a Porsche worse than a ford focus because you'll wear the tyres out quicker from driving harder, no of course not.

Its not like they use lower rated life caps, they don't, they just make a point of sticking to the rated service intervals as per parts makers specs.
 
However, I suspect that the strengths of Naim amps are very well suited to rock music. When I started getting into vintage Naim, rock music was probably the main beneficiary.
Interestingly, before I even bought my first Naim amp, I attended a demo of the newly launched NAC52 back in the late 80s. The elderly gentleman who bought it listened exclusively to classical music.
 
All caps have a rated lifetime, Naim just make a point of making sure people know to replace them before the performance tails off, rather than users just getting used to how things sound once past their best. One doesn't complain that valves don't last forever why should caps be any different, Naim have always been upfront about this, no reason why it should upset anyone. Do people cry when their tyres need replacing, no. Does it make a Porsche worse than a ford focus because you'll wear the tyres out quicker from driving harder, no of course not.

Its not like they use lower rated life caps, they don't, they just make a point of sticking to the rated service intervals as per parts makers specs.
I'm sure leaving the amps on 24/7 hastens the expiration of caps. If instead of leaving them on continuously, and switching on only for listening, those caps will last your lifetime (assuming 2-3 hours of listening a day).
 
I'd rather own an amplifier that never in my lifetime needed a service, than one which was supposed to get serviced every 10 years that was supported for 30 years.
This is just 2 models though isn't it, due to their design? I use an unserviced NAC12 from the mid to late 70s without issue or any obvious need for a service.
 
Given the choice between 2 amplifiers, where one sounds better than the other and where it also has capacitors that have a track record of lasting longer, I know which of the two I'd rate as having the better internal build quality. And it aint the Naim.

Er... this statement is nonsense, how can a non-Naim amp sound better than a Naim amp, that's the stupidest thing I've ever read on here.

On a serious note in my experience most of the time Naim amps don't need a service, but they do benefit from one... many other amps may do so too (I know Arkless services all sorts of amps, but they do not seem to be afforded the same level of hostility from non-owners of course), but those built by the Nikky-Nakky-Noo Corp. in China are unlikely to have the option of being returned to the manufacturer for such a procedure... maybe that's Naim's problem... they should just close the service department and tell everyone their amps don't need servicing!
 


advertisement


Back
Top