Craig B
Re:trophile
I stumbled upon this some time ago, may have been on the Naim Forum. In addition to the cool BOD sketch (remember those in the Hi-Fi comics?), what I find interesting is that this note, which was included in the box with the amplifiers before NACA4, described two different recipes for twisting up ones own 'speaker cables. We've all heard tell of the 4 sq mm twisted pairs, but I've certainly never heard any mention of 2.5 sq mm ones.
Another interesting bit is that, although Naim mentioned no specific minimum length, they specified maximum lengths for each conductor size, i.e. 12m max for 2.5 sq mm and 20m max for 4 sq mm (the latter the same as for NACA4/A5). On the other hand, there is an oblique suggestion that 6m pairs may be optimal, with them having quoted about 200pF capacitance for a 6m pair (i.e. circa 33.33 pF/m), and circa 4µH inductance for the same 6m length (i.e. circa .67µH/m). Strangely, there is no clarification as to whether this was for one, the other, or both conductor sizes.
Seems to me that the lengths would have to be different to hit those values.
Another interesting bit is that, although Naim mentioned no specific minimum length, they specified maximum lengths for each conductor size, i.e. 12m max for 2.5 sq mm and 20m max for 4 sq mm (the latter the same as for NACA4/A5). On the other hand, there is an oblique suggestion that 6m pairs may be optimal, with them having quoted about 200pF capacitance for a 6m pair (i.e. circa 33.33 pF/m), and circa 4µH inductance for the same 6m length (i.e. circa .67µH/m). Strangely, there is no clarification as to whether this was for one, the other, or both conductor sizes.
Seems to me that the lengths would have to be different to hit those values.
Last edited: