mansr
Objectionist
Harry is the ginger who wants to have his cake and eat it. William is his brother. Andrew is their creepy uncle. How did I do?I couldn’t tell you with any certainty right now who Harry, Andrew and William are for example
Harry is the ginger who wants to have his cake and eat it. William is his brother. Andrew is their creepy uncle. How did I do?I couldn’t tell you with any certainty right now who Harry, Andrew and William are for example
Harry is indeed ginger haired. Apart from that, if you are asking me I’m afraid I have no idea.Harry is the ginger who wants to have his cake and eat it. William is his brother. Andrew is their creepy uncle. How did I do?
On the subject of everything bad contributed to him in this thread, isn't that what royalties always done?
Let's compare him to, let's say, Richard 'the lionheart' and everything pales.
Why don’t you just get rid of monarchy altogether?
Well it is very difficult, nowadays. You used to chop off their heads or shoot them, and that was that. But you can't do that anymore, so they sort of linger forever, hang about, in and out of the tabloids all the time, set up charities or design furniture or underwear, write books, even. Maybe it is less trouble just keeping them.
Richard was good to Robin Hood, who has Big Ears been good to?
A monarchy is a symbol of an immature democracy
According to Sir Walter Scott, yes. I'm not sure he's 100% historically correct...
A monarchy symbolises a childish need to look up to an overlord.
A monarchy is a symbol of an immature democracy
Rubbish
Good point. Which I guess also makes Boris Johnson and populism another symptom of an immature democracyMaybe, but at the moment, it's our Monarchy that plays a very significant role in keeping other countries wanting to remain engaged with us.
No Monarchy? Then your leader has meetings with the PM, Deputy PM and foreign secretary. How attractive to those outside the UK do you think that would look at the moment?
Maybe, but at the moment, it's our Monarchy that plays a very significant role in keeping other countries wanting to remain engaged with us.
No Monarchy? Then your leader has meetings with the PM, Deputy PM and foreign secretary. How attractive to those outside the UK do you think that would look at the moment?
Maybe, but at the moment, it's our Monarchy that plays a very significant role in keeping other countries wanting to remain engaged with us.
No Monarchy? Then your leader has meetings with the PM, Deputy PM and foreign secretary. How attractive to those outside the UK do you think that would look at the moment?
Oh really? You think that Betty has much day-to-day interaction with any other government?
I wouldn't disagree entirely, but the Belgians, Danes, Dutch, Norwegians Spanish and Swedes may have a different view.
In some ways we jumped the gun with Oliver Cromwell.
Go and look at footage of G7 this year and see who the foreign leaders spent more time with. Clue: it's not our elected leaders.