Mr Underhill
pfm Member
Not really - it sounded great as an active setup. But then I've used active systems for a very long time.
How would you characterise the differences?
Not really - it sounded great as an active setup. But then I've used active systems for a very long time.
Well done Mr Underhill! SBLs are such great speakers they deserve something better than the standard Naim crossovers. I did go active with my pair (as has been pointed out, Naim really designed SBLs for active use; the crossovers were a bit of an afterthought), and I stuck with that setup for 15 - 18 years, until SL2s eventually replaced them.
I'm quite tempted to ask Les if he fancies the challenge of fettling my passive DBL crossovers, but given how much hassle I caused him with fitting gyrators to my 362 SNAXO, I'm not sure he'd want to get involved!
Yes, I thought this was an excellent thread, but in my case lead back to the same issue, even MORE boxes; not to mention it is not exactly pocket money. I would love to hear the system, if only he were closer.
M
Don't think passive ever was an afterthought, though Naim were doing active as the top of the amplifier range before they did speakers, more that SBLs were always intended to be sold passive and active, the bolt on passive XO works great in that way. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, so i don't subscribe to the "they made the passive XO sound worse on purpose", to my ears active does give you a little more of everything SBL does well, but hey it is a lot more in boxes and £ to get there so you would hope so!My passive SBLs never sound like an afterthought when I listen to them
Naim have always been very good with a defined upgrade path within their range. I appreciate that some people hate this concept & bemoan the expense involved. The cost has put me off going active with naim but have always been happy with my current set-upDon't think passive ever was an afterthought, though Naim were doing active as the top of the amplifier range before they did speakers, more that SBLs were always intended to be sold passive and active, the bolt on passive XO works great in that way. I'm not one for conspiracy theories, so i don't subscribe to the "they made the passive XO sound worse on purpose", to my ears active does give you a little more of everything SBL does well, but hey it is a lot more in boxes and £ to get there so you would hope so!
Exactly, and if you are happy, that is worth much more than any supposed improvement, more than that, let me say I suspect Les' nice XO are probably not going to bolt on to the back of your SBLs so you need to find space for them, and in going active not only did I need to buy a NAXO, HICAP and a 250, I also now have more audible transformer hum so I am looking to add DC blockers too! Buy some more music, enjoy what you have, and ignore my ramblings. The system isn't twice as good yet I now have twice as many olive boxes, is that value for money? Nope. Usual diminishing returns. I did it to scratch an itch i have had for probably best part of three decades. Best not to get the itch. Besides, we all know there is no end to this, why did I stop at SBLs, why not chase down DBLs or or or ... or I need to learn to be happy with what I have, something you have already got, now I'm jealous of thatNaim have always been very good with a defined upgrade path within their range. I appreciate that some people hate this concept & bemoan the expense involved. The cost has put me off going active with naim but have always been happy with my current set-up
Ha, ha. To be fair naim have had plenty of money from me over the years; the reality check for me was seeing how happy people are with relatively modest systems. A man has to have a hobby though.Exactly, and if you are happy, that is worth much more than any supposed improvement, more than that, let me say I suspect Les' nice XO are probably not going to bolt on to the back of your SBLs so you need to find space for them, and in going active not only did I need to buy a NAXO, HICAP and a 250, I also now have more audible transformer hum so I am looking to add DC blockers too! Buy some more music, enjoy what you have, and ignore my ramblings. The system isn't twice as good yet I now have twice as many olive boxes, is that value for money? Nope. Usual diminishing returns. I did it to scratch an itch i have had for probably best part of three decades. Best not to get the itch. Besides, we all know there is no end to this, why did I stop at SBLs, why not chase down DBLs or or or ... or I need to learn to be happy with what I have, something you have already got, now I'm jealous of that
A single Akurate Exaktbox-i does the crossovers and all the amplification channels necessary.
Get behind me Satan!
Well indeed, Linn digital stuff to drive Naim speakers active is clearly 21st century devil's magik (sic), we all know good old 20th century Naim amps to drive Linn speakers is acceptable, or indeed Naim amps to drive Naim speakers if you missed out on the glory days of Briks and Kans, but never widdershins
I bet! Would love to hear it, but have spent time and effort recreating my 90s dream system, so can't quite cope with the idea from a Salisbury centred universehe he Gidders is using the Linn digital front end and x-over to great effect with (Olive or CB, I can't recall) 250s into his SBLs.
Over the last few days I have been comparing the following power amps through the SBLs:
...
...
- Avondaled Naim CB250
Having done the rounds it is the ACB250 that I am listening to ....and toying with perhaps doing a 'next' step!
oooh so you are thinking NCC220 now?
EDIT: I should say I have wondered about NCC220 and HCR200 for my Olive 250s, but the cost is enough to make me think more than twice!