Advertisement



  1. Things you need to know about the new ‘Conversations’ PM system:

    a) DO NOT REPLY TO THE NOTIFICATION EMAIL! I get them, not the intended recipient. I get a lot of them and I do not want them! It is just a notification, log into the site and reply from there.

    b) To delete old conversations use the ‘Leave conversation’ option. This is just delete by another name.
    Dismiss Notice

MDAC First Listen (part 00111010)

Discussion in 'audio' started by JohnW, Jun 9, 2018.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. wintoid

    wintoid pfm Member

    @JohnW is the detox dead now?
     
    HarryB likes this.
  2. sq225917

    sq225917 Bit of this, bit of that

    I'll try for munich
     
    JohnW likes this.
  3. JohnW

    JohnW pfm member

    No... but those going for the MDAC2 / FDAC will have no need as it will be an internal option - so development sponsorship can be transferred to the option.
     
    ti33er, uwe061, gints and 1 other person like this.
  4. Rune

    Rune pfm Member

    That will work for me
     
  5. Stunsworth

    Stunsworth pfm Member

    To be honest that means it’s effectively dead because I can’t imagine there are too many Detox sponsors that haven't also sponsored the M-DAC 2 or FDAC. Still, it’s good news that funds can be transferred.
     
    Bob L, Rune and kennyh like this.
  6. JohnW

    JohnW pfm member

    The DAC's internal Detox option is more advanced then the standalone Detox - progressive development based on experience with the first Detox design.
     
    Last edited: Feb 4, 2019
    Bob L, uwe061, Rune and 1 other person like this.
  7. Bob L

    Bob L pfm Member

    I can sympathise with that! However, with a bit of luck you could pick up another on eBay for less than £300 .My old one will appear there soon, but ideally you'd wait until somebody offers a non-functioning one- there must be a few out there with very leaky capacitors...
     
  8. paulski

    paulski pfm Member

    Yes, but then I'd be paying c £300 for a sleeve to house my MDAC!
     
  9. Stunsworth

    Stunsworth pfm Member

    The M-DAC 2 board was always intended as a replacement for the standard one, so there was always a requirement for a doner unit of some kind.
     
  10. paulski

    paulski pfm Member

    True but the donor was originally going to supply at least the sleeve and front panel. Things have moved on.
     
  11. misterdog

    misterdog Not the canine kind

    Remote and power supply.
     
  12. JohnW

    JohnW pfm member

    Sadly this is still cheaper then me trying to arrange tooling + extrusions for say 50 sleeves - also factor the Silver / Black mix...

    The MDAC extrusion tooling is very expensive as the sleeve has a hollowed out center + requires a large extrusion die...

    Also, Remote + PSU...

    I'll need to battle the Chassis issue for VFET / FDAC - I'll have better resources once the MDAC2'a ship. At this time, I just dont have the spare mental will to start another battle to reengineering MDAC chassis.
     
  13. paulski

    paulski pfm Member

    I thought the MDAC2 had a new power supply?
     
  14. JohnW

    JohnW pfm member

    MDAC2 has a new rear panel connector that comes with an adapter lead to allow reuse of the existing PSU - or possiblty to use a better supply. Its well beyond the scope of this project to safety certify a new PSU.
     
  15. paulski

    paulski pfm Member

    Ah, ok. Thanks, John.
     
  16. Rune

    Rune pfm Member

    If reusing the MDAC chassis is the fast track then lets do that.

    Somehow I suspect that I will end up paying more for a donor MDAC than I got for the one I sold. But that life.

    And hopefully the VFET / FDAC crowd is less cost sensitive so it will be easier to find nice chassis.
     
  17. BigDog

    BigDog pfm Member

    Well, I am one of those who ARE interested in a standalone DETOX. Having tried competitive USB decrapifiers and found them unacceptable, I was excited by the prospect of a "pull out all the stops (e.g., a purposely designed CNC chassis) design". Being happy with my DAC then and now, I did not need another one.

    While I have a (small) dog in the fight, I am disappointed with the fact that the external DETOX will be outperformed by the internal DETOX design! :(
    That being said and given the time elapsed and knowledge gained in the interim, maybe I should not be surprised that "DETOX" is a "trickle up" tech. Too bad that the supporters of the standalone design will get a lower level of performance, an as yet undelivered product already superseded by another undelivered product?!

    Signed..."Having Trouble Making Lemonade"
     
  18. sq225917

    sq225917 Bit of this, bit of that

    John, you can stick my detox payment into the pot for whatever you need it for. I'm going pi.
     
  19. StephenB

    StephenB Pointy birds...........

    please switch my 2 detox donations as well. or credit towards my final choice, at least then I can only moan about the non delivery of FDAC L3 and VFETS
     
    HarryB likes this.
  20. clivem2

    clivem2 pfm Member

    I recall one of the original design concepts for Detox was to keep it external as once RF hits the inside of a DAC it's a waste of time trying to fix it. It seems like this concept has been superseded.

    I'm another who now is not that interested in my Detox stake....
     
    HarryB likes this.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page





Advertisement


  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice