JohnW,
I don't really understand then why we are sinking so much time into developing the MDAC2 in this situation.
Based on your posts here it seems like many months/years have been devoted to solely trying to pack everything onto a small board. That to me seems like waisted investment of time and money.
First we invested so much time previously pushing it into the old MDAC chassis, that was scraped and the FDAC design seemed to save us. And so much progress was made, but then it was bloated with everyone here's additional requirements which were never really planned for and sunk the FDAC timeline into oblivion.
Now it seems were back to bad investments in miniaturization vs product dev.
Why not just keep moving forward with simplified FDAC and let the consolidation of additional features happen on future rev's which people can optionally wait for if they so choose?
When the FDAC was announced as the new direction, I like many others, sold my MDAC shell and upgraded to something else as an interim step while we wait. now we are locked out of the MDAC2 and back on the someday train. I support the effort but I really don't get it...
Aaron