PM declares "no direct correlation between certain crimes and police numbers".
On this she’s right.
PM declares "no direct correlation between certain crimes and police numbers".
...and Austerity is over too!PM declares "no direct correlation between certain crimes and police numbers".
PM declares "no direct correlation between certain crimes and police numbers".
This is why it’s pointless Labour trying to compete on this ground, it can’t win. May’s right: there’s very little evidence of significant, direct connection between violent crime and police numbers. Labour shouldn't be pushing for more cops and more prisons.Whereas you could absolutely guarantee that had Police numbers been decimated under Labour, then there would be a correlation.
This is why it’s pointless Labour trying to compete on this ground, it can’t win. May’s right: there’s very little evidence of significant, direct connection between violent crime and police numbers. Labour shouldn't be pushing for more cops and more prisons.
and make people feel safer so less likely to feel the need to carry a knife.Had Police numbers been higher, perhaps they wouldn't be as stretched as they seemingly are, stuck behind desks doing paperwork, less visible Police on the streets, and perhaps less likely that kids would be wandering around with kitchen knives in their jackets, because there is a greater deterrent out there which makes them think a little bit harder about what they're doing.
Sure, on the first point. Disagree on the 2nd.I think you missed my point a bit. I am not saying Labour should be competing, or whatever, I am saying that if it had not been the Tories who have slashed Police numbers (by 20,000 since 2010 to around 120,000 now) then no doubt May would have been blaming those who made the cuts and attributing the rise in knife crime to a depleted Police force. Instead, it was her - so she's attempting to pass the buck here, quite obviously.
Had Police numbers been higher, perhaps they wouldn't be as stretched as they seemingly are, stuck behind desks doing paperwork, less visible Police on the streets, and perhaps less likely that kids would be wandering around with kitchen knives in their jackets, because there is a greater deterrent out there which makes them think a little bit harder about what they're doing.
Disagree on the 2nd.
We already had (have!) loads of cops: police numbers relative to the population doubled between the war and 2010. There's no evidence of any significant causal relation between police numbers and violent crime, and lots of reason to believe that cops going around performing stop and search on black kids has negative effects. Not only will piling up cops not solve the problem, it will channel attention and funds away from more positive solutions and shore up an already toxic and authoritarian law and order discourse. Labour are crazy to try and outflank the Tories from the right, it's always counterproductive. Today we've had Javid promising increased police powers and Williamson offering to send in the army. Not good!Care to elaborate why?
I entirely agree that more needs to be done from a social perspective. But on the numbers thing, I don't agree - nor does the Police Chief, Home Office, Mayor, Leader Of The Opposition, etc etc. No doubt at all that the Tories own the lot, though.