Cereal Killer
432
That's not really an option anymore, wish it was though
Ynwan, you don't see the upgrade bug associated with any manufacturer?
Seriously.
But isn't it up to the buyer, and not the manufacturer, to determine what is affordable and/or appropriate? To portray either Naim or Linn as evil or manipulative is just another way of abdicating responsibility for individual purchasing decisions. Are we really so weak-willed? I don't think so.
I can help noticing that on the respective forums Naim folk post more, argue more, moan more and box swap or upgrade more, (or talk about upgrades). The linn forum however seems to be a much calmer place. Yes there is the occasionsl whinge but in the main people seem stable, content and not so afflicted with upgradeitis.
Now this could be for many reasons of course ... Anyone care to offer some of those up ?
You've pretty much defined "musicality" there, but didn't Naim also claim to have that compared with the competition (before Linn made amps, of course)? Can I ask which Naims you had and which Linns you now have?One reason I would suggest, which will raise heckles because it is a Linn marketing mantra is this: to my ear Linn gear seems to prioritise musical qualities (tune and rhythm) above sound qualities (bass extension, imaging, flat response and tone). Therefore it appeals to those who want to forget about gear and just enjoy the basic musical qualities. I recently switched from Naim amps to Linn amps. The sound is less impressive, but I don't find myself thinking about the sound, or the gear, while I'm enjoying music. That quality of sounding less impressive, but just getting the gear out of the way of the music may be why there is less moaning and upgraditis in the Linn forum: people there are more content and musically satisfied.
I'm not suggesting that Linn gear is more musically satisfying than other non-Naim gear btw, just that it's often more mollifying than the typical Naim sound.
Cue flamewar.
You've pretty much defined "musicality" there, but didn't Naim also claim to have that compared with the competition (before Linn made amps, of course)?
Can I ask which Naims you had and which Linns you now have?
Lotus,
Start with a nice rug, then build the system around it.
Rug first as they say on the rug forum.
Joe
That's my opinion too, except for the "one hour" bit. It's never taken more than a couple of minutes in my case to realise that I was enjoying the music so much more through Linns, even the first LK1-LK2 (vs 32-250). Naims always sound harsh and spitty to me.Agreed, but I think my point is that Linn concentrate harder on "musicality" and less on "impressive sound" than Naim. I would guess that this makes Naim more likely to win a one hour shoot-out, and be bought by less experienced shoppers. The more laid-back, and to my ear, more musical Linn sound may be easier to live with in the long run once one tires of the thrill of impressive sound effects and wants to follow, for example, complex harmonies.
IMO the LK1, LK2, and LK280 were bargains that I could buy new. That stopped with the Kairn and Klout, which I bought used and still have. I doubt that I'll ever be able to justify buying any of the Klimax range, even used, but I'm glad to hear that the music-first idea is still present and correct. Thanks for the infoSure, my last Naim amps were olive 82/HiCap/250 and I now use a KK and a pair of activated 5125's. Although the new prices of my Linn amps would somewhat exceed the new prices of my previous Naim setup, I originally bought the Naim amps new, whereas I bought the Linn stuff used, so the price difference wasn't much. Also, since the system is now active, it's a pretty unfair comparison, but I still think that my experience may be relevant to the respective signature sounds of Linn and Naim, having listened to many Linn and Naim setups over the years.
One reason I would suggest, which will raise heckles because it is a Linn marketing mantra is this: to my ear Linn gear seems to prioritise musical qualities (tune and rhythm) ...
Whether the music demands it or not.
Good reproduction of music always demands good resolution of tunes and rhythms. If a recording contains no tunes and no rhythms then it contains no music. Discuss ;-)
Oh, right. Good as opposed to over-hyped at the expense of everything else? So is that the *only* thing good music reproduction needs? Evrything else it irrelevant?