Daniel Quinn
Banned
Not true. Companies also outsource for reasons of better expertise, lack of available resource undertake development/manufacturing internally and a myriad of other reasons.
All things that can be bought in if cheaper .
Not true. Companies also outsource for reasons of better expertise, lack of available resource undertake development/manufacturing internally and a myriad of other reasons.
All things that can be bought in if cheaper .
I am staggered that this bit of metal costs £2,450.
But then it's Linn, so maybe I'm not that staggered.
My point of reference is, of course, my own turntable, which is made entirely of precision machined aluminium, steel and acetal. And when I say precision, I mean 0.01mm tolerance, but then the manufacturer makes satellites and such like most of the time and have their own £multi-million CNC lathes.
http://www.claro-audio.co.uk/claro_newsite/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/diagram-12.jpg
http://www.claro-audio.co.uk/claro_newsite/blog/black-beauty/
The base of my unit is probably three times more complex to manufacture than the Linn Keel, as it has fixings for two arms, two separate motor housings underneath, the bearing housing and the leg fittings. Taking all the other bits into account, it's seeming a bit of a bargain.
I do know that the power supply, which is solid aluminium and is a work of art, costs £450 to machine.
So how much should the Keel sell for? I would have been willing to go maybe $1,500.
I think people are rather missing the point about the price here.
As much as I consider the price way too high, the fact is, this is (mostly) free market economics, where the price is almost entirely dictated by what people are willing to pay for an item. That usually has, at best, only a remote correlation to the development and manufacturing costs.
And clearly, enough people are willing to pay Linn's price, so.......
I think people are rather missing the point about the price here.
As much as I consider the price way too high, the fact is, this is (mostly) free market economics, where the price is almost entirely dictated by what people are willing to pay for an item. That usually has, at best, only a remote correlation to the development and manufacturing costs.
And clearly, enough people are willing to pay Linn's price, so.......
I can't understand it. Why do some of you love bagging on Linn so much?
They make a good product. You're not obligated to buy it. You wanna B*tch, b*tch about taxes. That's something you have to pay. The fact that you can go out and buy a greenstreet for less is a great option (or Mark's new Tangerine thingy or a Rubikon or whatever) and clearly has reasons why they're less.
It's so easy to criticize but at the end of the day why is a manufacturer obligated to charge as little as possible for a product? It's "free market". If something is inappropriately priced it won't sell and they'll end up getting served for their mistake.
Man it's like a kvetch session out here.
I bought Linn (Akurate) and sold the lot inside 18 months, so I'm allowed to kvetch. Found the sound dry and thin, dull frankly. I have just posted the figures and the fact is that it is a successful company but not unusually profitable because it obviously costs a lot of money to design, manufacture and market the product range, that seems to change far more rapidly than many other companies.
My Keel figures were wrong. Assume £2,000 retail net of VAT, retailer makes 30% so £1,400 to Linn, so 58.4% gross margin implies £582 cost to make. Still seems a bit high, so margin may be a bit higher.
Out curiosity, what did you replace the Akurate with?
Replaced the ADS with a PS Audio DAC mk2
Replaced the 2200 amp with a Bryson 4BSST2, but found it slow to warm up and then fatiguing, so changed to a valve amp.