MerseyRail has already settled for 7% but the Government is currently blocking any progress in the national talks
That is good news.
MerseyRail has already settled for 7% but the Government is currently blocking any progress in the national talks
No, this is completely consistent with his politics, such as they are. People overestimate Lammy because he does stand up to racism, and usually seems basically normal.Lammy was hopeless on Sky too. I’ve normally a lot of time for him as he is not afraid to speak truth to Tory racism, but I guess he is crippled by Labour’s Daily Mail/focus-group fence of evasion on everything so had to stick to the script. I very much doubt this was his view, it is coming from the central strategy department that has crippled Labour this century on every gammon tabloid issue. The trade unions need to coordinate and as a block defund the Labour party IMO. They should maybe plough the same money directly into the Greens and PR activism. Just cut Labour out of the picture as they add no value.
No, this is completely consistent with his politics, such as they are. People overestimate Lammy because he does stand up to racism, and usually seems basically normal.
Wether vain?Lammy = Shadow Foreign Secretary.
He's a weather vane.
David Lammy is exceptionally clear in this clip:
https://twitter.com/BBCPolitics/status/1540991059718819840
A "categorical no" - he does not support striking BA workers at Heathrow.
For the record, the workers are asking for the 10% pay cut they took during the pandemic, to keep the show on the road (in the sky?!), to be reversed.
If Labour can't support this most modest of requests, what the hell is it for?
Needless to say, I will give Labour exactly the same amount of support at the next election.
Incidentally, Lammy has "earned" around £40000 for speeches this year, on top of his salary as an MP.
Wasn’t Keir Starmer’s pledge to work “shoulder to shoulder” with trade unions, rather than arm wrestling from opposite sides of a negotiating table?A negotiation is only possible if both sides have cards to hold. What a complete t*sser..
Funny that supertanskiii thinks Christian Wakeford's defection was a "moral decision".A completely unsubstantiated Twitter rumour that a Tory to Lab defection is fairly imminent. I’m amazed Labour take them. The last one was a pretty nasty piece of work as far as I could tell, very gammon.
Funny that supertanskiii thinks Christian Wakeford's defection was a "moral decision".
The guy was railing against refugees crossing the English Channel and calling the Labour front bench a bunch of ****s just a few weeks before he crossed the floor.
You'd have to be supremely gullible to think he had suddenly seen the light.
I think it is important to recognise that labour is being torn between two horses, one is it’s traditional core values (which need updating) and the other is Tory populism. Tory populism very much has the dominant hand, so we should not be surprised that borderline racists would, to mix metaphors, jump ship. But they are not jumping to an enemy ship, they are jumping to a ship that is closely alliedAgreed. As you are likely aware by now I have a very, very low opinion of Labour, but I was genuinely surprised they took him. He was UKIP/borderline EDL grade to my eyes and I don’t understand why Labour would make such a laughing stock of any selection process the party should have. No way in hell would I vote for a candidate like that even in a marginal hanging by one vote. May as well take the Tory rapists/sex-pests etc too if it is only about numbers.
For the record, the workers are asking for the 10% pay cut they took during the pandemic, to keep the show on the road (in the sky?!), to be reversed.
Even the Evil Capitalists at the FT reported that the union is simply asking for cut pay to be reinstated - just as BA management have had their pay reinstated.
I still can’t get my head round Lammy’s stance. Wonder what he will say about the threatened action from Barristers?