If our politics is systematically flawed, should we acquiesce with it gain power, challenge it head on, or pretend to acquiesce with a view to changing the system once in power?This little history lesson on Wikipedia is interesting/depressing. To summarise; since the party’s creation the only successful Labour leaders have been Clement Attlee, Harold Wilson and Tony Blair. Just three people in well over a century. Everyone else (McDonald, Callaghan, Brown etc) either failed to win a majority, acted as a short-term caretaker or failed entirely against the Tories in a general election. In that same time-frame eleven Tories have won a majority.
PS From my perspective this is just further evidence that we don’t live in anything even approaching a representative democracy, the whole thing is shit on a stick as far as I’m concerned. I bet not one of those governments actually achieved a mandate from over 50% of people of voting age so had no right to the dictatorship they took for a term or more. Many of the early elections were before many (e.g. women) even had the right to vote, such was the inherent bias of our system. Before that lies slavery, tyranny, imperialism etc.
If our politics is systematically flawed, should we acquiesce with it gain power, challenge it head on, or pretend to acquiesce with a view to changing the system once in power?
If our politics is systematically flawed, should we acquiesce with it gain power, challenge it head on, or pretend to acquiesce with a view to changing the system once in power?
Agree with much of that, however, Labour are not exceptional. Let’s not forget that it was who Clegg chose to give us 10 years of Tory austerity and attacks on public services rather than side with Brown and also threw away pledges on PR and tuition fees into the bargain. Nor should we forget Swinson who rejected calls from left, right and centre to forge an anti Tory/anti hard-Brexit alliance in favour of pursuing personal ambition.My view is all non-Tory parties need to unify fully behind true proportional representation. The exact same pledge should appear in every party’s manifesto right across the board. The problem is it will never happen as Labour is still a ‘career party’, such an establishment. Just as much as the Tories in many respects with countless MPs in seats where no matter how awful they are at their jobs they will get voted back in for life and later end up in the HoL. It is a safe corporate career path and sadly too many trough-feeders in the ranks will never give that up. This is a key reason I have long felt the Labour party is entirely unfit for purpose and always vote for one of the PR-supporting parties. I’d figured out the electoral system was utter bollocks long before I was even able to vote. Growing up in a Tory safe seat does that to a person!
I really do think we need a shake-up politically. Leave the Tories with their history of slave trading, denying women and the poor the vote, their inherited land ownership, their millionaire’s education, their gowns, tights, Black Rod, monarchy, Queens Speech and all that archaic shite. That is just what they are, they’ll never change. The left and centre of politics should be fighting in a unified manner to implement a true modern representative democracy with a proper constitution and bill of rights. It should be fighting to move the country into the 21st century.
Do you trust any politician to be elected on a "get me in and I'll change things" ticket to deliver once in?
Agree with much of that, however, Labour are not exceptional.
Since that isn't going to happen (and, if it did, it would guarantee Tory rule for decades), what practical suggestions do you have for change?Agreed, all fall far short of the mark IMO. My hope is Layla Moran can build the Lib Dems back into what they really should be, assuming of course she gets the job.
Sadly I don’t think Labour is fixable. It is just too riddled with the past in so, so many ways, and that’s everything from the 1970s trade union trough-feeders, the UKIP gammon, the Republican imperialism such Iraq, the total incoherent cluster**** of focus groups, policy recursion and dithering of recent years etc. It really is a dinosaur looking for a museum. Being archaic and obsolete suits the Tories, it is what they are at their core DNA, but the left needs to be a dynamic forward-looking 21st century entity. There are a lot of Labour MPs I really like, some thoroughly decent people in the ranks, but really the whole thing needs ripping down and rebuilding from scratch IMHO.
the whole thing needs ripping down and rebuilding from scratch
Layla Moran seems like a decent politician so I'm surprised to see Ed Davey is currently favourite to become the next Lib-Dem leader. Seems like a huge error not to embrace change but maybe they'e just another bunch of dinosaurs.
Layla Moran seems like a decent politician so I'm surprised to see Ed Davey is currently favourite to become the next Lib-Dem leader. Seems like a huge error not to embrace change but maybe they'e just another bunch of dinosaurs.
how do you do that democratically? And what party has any sort of vision for what this post revolution political system would look like?
I really do think we need a shake-up politically. Leave the Tories with their history of slave trading, denying women and the poor the vote, their inherited land ownership, their millionaire’s education, their gowns, tights, Black Rod, monarchy, Queens Speech and all that archaic shite. That is just what they are, they’ll never change. The left and centre of politics should be fighting in a unified manner to implement a true modern representative democracy with a proper constitution and bill of rights. It should be fighting to move the country into the 21st century.
I quite agree that we need a shake-up politically, but I absolutely disagree that the lib-dems are the party to do it; they had their chance to shine and made a complete balls-up of it and would never get my vote.