davidsrsb
pfm Member
The latest stable release is out, plenty of useful bug fixes
https://kicad-pcb.org/blog/2020/05/KiCad-5.1.6-Release/
https://kicad-pcb.org/blog/2020/05/KiCad-5.1.6-Release/
It has its share of quirks, but so do all CAD programs. Development really took off when CERN got involved a while back, and v5 is much nicer than v4 was.What's Kicad like then? I may go for it... My groan with much CAD freeware is that the GUI and general facilities are often arcane and really awkward... anything but intuitive! Spice sim and PCB layout programs that seem to have been designed for use by IT professionals and not EE's is often the result...
If you're familiar with Eagle, you'll probably find KiCad easy enough to adapt to. I've used KiCad to make some 4-layer boards with both SMD and through-hole parts. All the basics are there. It has diff pair routing (if a little clunky), but that's about as advanced as it gets. High-speed parallel buses and large BGA chips might be a challenge, but something tells me you weren't planning on using either. And don't expect the auto-router to do anything useful.
Someone even made a t-shirt:I have yet to see any PCB software in which the auto-router was any more use than a chocolate tea pot...
Cadstar was horrible, I have also used Zuken Visula long ago, Protel and OrcadI had to use Zuken Cadstar at work for quite a while... nightmare! Then moved to EAGLE which I find pretty good.
I will usually be doing just a single sided board and at most a double sided one. Through hole components exclusively (well apart from times when I really need a specific IC function and it can only be obtained in SMD anyway!).
Now't worse than some CAD freeware in which to do a task you maybe have to enter a script in almost HTML like gobbledegook with certain variables adjusted etc into the registry or similar as opposed to just drag and drop with a good commercial version.
Lots of parts have multiple package options. Makes sense to me. When only one package exists, the schematic library symbol can/should specify its footprint.Symbol and footprint independent eh? Not too sure about that....
I'm hoping that with 1000's of users and it's freeware/opensource nature that vast libraries of parts will already be extant and plenty of older/"obsolete" parts amongst them? Valve's for example and their sockets... This would be my numero uno motive for choosing any PCB package...
Symbol and footprint independent eh? Not too sure about that....
I have, apart form EAGLE, Ultiboard, as part of Multisim, and have never used it yet... as I do my simulations with Multisim (love it! So much better than LTSpice which is a typical crap GUI freeware program) it should be particularly easy to just export the schematic from the sim to Ultiboard... in theory...
I downloaded Kicad latest version last night anyway... 32 bit!
Non switching amp in box
ns by
TDA1541A, note extra decoupling, which was effective in reducing noise, particularly from the filter, which also needed a heatsink.
tda1514A by
OPA828 based shunt RIAA amplifier, dual mono.
riaa by
PCBs of various projects left to right RIAA, hifi world phono pre, hifi world heater supply for pre, hifi world HT for pre, Non switching MOSFET power amplifier, Class A power amplifier.
pcb by
Any one feeling brave is welcome to the full design files in kicad.
there is a valve preamp done in kicad on one of the pictures below, for hobby use it’s hard to justify paying for anything commercial when Kicad is so good.
BTW you can get a grey market latest version of 64bit windows for a couple of quid on eBay, even if you mainly use Linux as I do it’s worth having a copy at that price.
Have you considered buying something from this century?My PC is 32 bit!
My PC is 32 bit!
Fair enough. My main computer is from 2009, though it's received a few upgrades over the years.It's a top spec PC from about 2006 and works just great for everything I want to do. My next one will of course be 64 bit If it ain't broke...