OK, sean and drood, one dog walk & swim later, I apologise & accept your comments and amend to "apparent reticence".
A UK-resident Indian friend of mine over the last 40 years is married to a prominent Muslim lawyer, now known well to the Muslim Council. Having supper with them around 2006, I commented on a letter I'd read in The Sunday Times concerning a perceived inadequately low level of response to the 2005 London bombings from the UK's Muslim community & the concern that underlying this is a belief held by many Muslims that quite possibly jihad should be supported in some way ... or at least not necessarily outright condemned, as it might be disloyal to their faith to do so. I added that I too felt this concern. My friend's wife clearly understood this and made no attempt to brush it aside, telling me that this was being addressed as fully as possible at every level of the UK Muslim community. In other words, it was indeed an issue.
There's no doubt that today all the right proclamations are being made, but it might be naive to underestimate the degree of subtle support that still exists for certain imams, most of whom are now much more careful with their language than in the past. Even Yusuf Islam, by most accounts a lovely, peace-loving fellow, said some extraordinarily provocative things in the past - remember the Rushdie fatwa commotion ?
So, perhaps you will call me Islamaphobic : if concern about anyone's underlying religious agenda possibly involving violence meets that definition, then so be it. I expect I have closely known and still know a lot more Muslims that the average Scottish Presbyterian, having studied the teachings of Pir Vilayat Inayat Khan in my youth & even attempted (unsuccessfully) to read a translation of the Koran. If it was possible to have a new language "uploaded" Matrix style (think Neo's martial arts or helicopter flying), Arabic would be my immediate first choice, purely for the unbridled joy of Rumi's poetry untouched by translation.