Wow what a long-lived thread!
I'm diving in, as I've just received an Arcam Delta 170.3 and a DPA Little Bit Three.
I have questions.. of course..
The DPA uses a Yamaha chip which Tom described as 'crude'. My expectations of this DAC are fairly moderate given it's age.. I'm not looking for reassurance... but I am interested in an assessment of it's technical abilities (or lack thereof), how well it performs against modern DACs, any other quirks of note. Just curious...
The coaxial inputs work fine on this one, but I'm not sure about the optical. Feeding a signal from a Panasonic DMR-E85 I get noise. From an XBOX.. the sound is OK, but there are occasional glitches (which I presume could pose a risk to tweeters?). Curiously, these seem more prevalent on quieter passages. Using the 170.3 I don't hear any obvious fault, but I was fairly shocked that it sounds quite a lot different to the coaxial input!! Not warmer as the two page photocopied "handbook" suggests - actually a lot more high end. Now I'm wondering if the optical input on the DPA is weak, and the Arcam puts out more light or better precision and thus is able to pass a better signal, but it still introduces jitter... or maybe the cable is poor.. or.... anybody got any thoughts on this??
Also the input switch is a bit iffy.. is that easy to replace??
Readers may be amazed to learn the Arcam is fully working bar one minor fault - the drawer mechanism sometimes doesn't work properly. It can come out a little bit then pulls itself back in. I guess I need to lubricate the guides and/or change the belt?? Still.. for a drive of this age.. impressive!!
(BTW I'm not an engineer or anything but I like to 'dabble'...)
Sorry for all the questions.. you know how it is..