I can't see the strictly stereo measurements, they are not online anymore.
I don't understand if the 5/9 have a flat response or not.
Is the mentioned "BBC dip" realistic and if yes, in which frequencies?
I have the 5/9, and I think they have the voices in evidence, but I don't think they are warm speakers.
Thanks
I can't see the strictly stereo measurements, they are not online anymore.
I don't understand if the 5/9 have a flat response or not.
Is the mentioned "BBC dip" realistic and if yes, in which frequencies?
I have the 5/9, and I think they have the voices in evidence, but I don't think they are warm speakers.
Thanks
Are you looking for this...? Please note that these are in room rather than anechoic or pseudo-anechoic measurements.
Are you still able to change the colour of Left LS6?
Current layout is confusing.
Interesting, the 5/9 has noticeable bump at 120Hz while the 3/6 has one at 80Hz. Were the two pairs of speakers measured in the same location?No. This is a JPEG I made three years ago from a set of measurements that I had no reason to keep. The colours are baked in.
Interesting, the 5/9 has noticeable bump at 120Hz while the 3/6 has one at 80Hz. Were the two pairs of speakers measured in the same location?
That room is exceptionally well-behaved above 150Hz, is it a large room?
Are you looking for this...? Please note that these are in room rather than anechoic or pseudo-anechoic measurements.
Thanks for posting theses curves.
The differences in the 2.5-7 kHz region are surprisingly large. The LS6 looks like a very well designed speaker. Does the LS6f have a similar response above 1k?
The LS5/9 and LS6 are both lovely sounding speakers, but I would say that the LS6 is the better measuring speaker overall.
The LS6 and LS6f measure essentially the same except that the floorstanding LS6f has a little extra low end extension.
I have never seen a full set of measurements of both speakers that was comparable, but I doubt that the LS6 measures better in terms of distortion.
The in-room frequency response doesn't look flatter, just slightly different.
The LS6 has more extended treble.
Yes, it the tweeter is a modern SEAS design, not the current version of the old Audax.
I have never seen a full set of measurements of both speakers that was comparable, but I doubt that the LS6 measures better in terms of distortion.
The in-room frequency response doesn't look flatter, just slightly different.
No. Look again at the differences in 2.5 -7 kHz region. The LS 6 clearly has the flatter FR. The difference will be audible.
could be this (in the midrange) the "BBC dip" mentioned before who the 5/9 would have?
I have never seen a full set of measurements of both speakers that was comparable, but I doubt that the LS6 measures better in terms of distortion.
The in-room frequency response doesn't look flatter, just slightly different.
I was referencing what @al2002 said.If you are referencing my measurements, I do not see a BBC dip here. What I see are two generally well behaved and tonally accurate speakers playing in an untreated listening room. The only reliable takeaways from my charts are that both speakers have similar low end extension and that the LS6 has more extended treble.
No. Look again at the differences in 2.5 -7 kHz region. The LS 6 clearly has the flatter FR. The difference will be audible.
I was referencing what @al2002 said.
I had recently an experience, I took my GA LS5/9 in my friends home, to compare them to his Opera Gran Callas speakers.
My friend was telling me that the LS5/9 is warmer than his speakers, which is very flat and neutral.
But I don't think the 5/9 is a warm speaker, it has the midrange in evidence, voices are more present, but tonally I think they are neutral
in my opinion the 5/9 has a more natural presentation of the human voices, compared to the Opera speakers, but for this reason I wanted to check out the graphs and freq. response to dig a little bit in this