sunbeamgls
pfm Member
Its not nonsense, its my opinion. You could express your thoughts politely too.No, this is nonsense.
Its not nonsense, its my opinion. You could express your thoughts politely too.No, this is nonsense.
not my experience, quite the opposite.All this about FR measurement is not the key thing with these speakers. They're "polite" and that won't show in the FR plots - some would say laid back, I would say lacking drive and dynamics. Some will like this, others not.
Would be good to understand the reasons pleaseConfidence 20s any day....
I've tried to like the BBC designs for as long as i can remember and have found them very good on certain types of music but they just don't do it for me. After a while the dips starts to become fairly obvious. The BBC sound signature is warm and soft and generally causes them to distort badly when turned up.Would be good to understand the reasons please
Interesting to think of the Harbeths as modern designs...There are some ( mainly Harbeth owners ) who look down on the 5/9. They contend things have moved on from these old BBC designs.
I can't comment, as I have never heard the Graham, but it has been widely accepted by many.
Interesting to think of the Harbeths as modern designs...
(this is an observation, not a view on if older designs are better or worse)
I've tried to like the BBC designs for as long as i can remember and have found them very good on certain types of music but they just don't do it for me. After a while the dips starts to become fairly obvious. The BBC sound signature is warm and soft and generally causes them to distort badly when turned up.
There are some ( mainly Harbeth owners ) who look down on the 5/9. They contend things have moved on from these old BBC designs.
I can't comment, as I have never heard the Graham, but it has been widely accepted by many.
confidence 20 use a 6.5 inch woofer vs a 8 inch woofer of the graham.Yeah. Or maybe I'll just splash out on the new Dynaudio Confidence 20.
confidence 20 use a 6.5 inch woofer vs a 8 inch woofer of the graham.
just for this, i cannot take seriously a 6.5 inch bass speaker. very limited spl wise, distortion will be easily too high, limited extension. all this even more expensive then the ls59
Many Harbeth are brand faithful and they congregate around Pastor Shaw at the HUG.
Shaw is rightly critical of the original LS5/9 design .
That is a superb resource, hardly anyone measures their speakers with that degree of professionalism.I was being tongue in cheek there - of course there are a lot of differences between those two speakers, one of them being that the Dyns are twice as expensive than the LS5/9.
Also, the Dyns use in house drivers, while the LS5/9 are not. And there are probably more people working in Dynaudio's R&D department than at the entire company that is Graham Audio. And there is no hope in hell that they ever get anywhere near to obtaining a testing facility like this:
In Graham Audio's defence, I'm not sure in which direction large companies like B&W, Dynaudio, Focal etc. are moving with their new owners, and with the changing market re expensive high end speakers. Graham Audio seems to be bit removed from all that (in a good way, as I stated in my OP). Maybe in 5 years, those three companies I mentioned and others like them may end up only producing wireless soundbars that end up as landfill 3 years after the purchase because they are unserviceable.
It's amazing he's is able to brainwash so many disciples