Erm, Garrard 401/Notts/DL110, AVI CD2000MC, Yaqin amp, 4 x ESL57s. Less than £2000. Nice nusic, as good as I've heard.Mine, LP12/72/Hi/160/Kef 104.2/Rega Jupiter/A5, cost me £2300.
Beat that!
"buy British , buy Naim" .... I have a NAS Hyperspace , Ekos tonearm , TE Groove phono stage , Avondale Grad1/TPX2 , Avondale modded (Naim)CD3 , Avondale mono amps , Avondale Rev1 speakers .... there very little Naim in there and its all British
I think Naim have done very well. No point crying into your respective beers, Naim, Rega et al have moved on, it's called progress.
They've survived a lot better that Quad, Audiolab, Mission Castle etc which are no more than British names for Chinese products, and they haven't had to take the outsourcing to China route of Kef, Creek, Epos, Monitor Audio et al.
Really, you guys should be celebrating not pining for the days when Naim knitted their own packaging in the fields around Salisbury Cathedral!
I've done it.
Came on here all Naim guns ablazing, armed really only with my knowledge of how things were 15 years ago, and thought I wanted a full active SBL setup with an LP12 and a CDS3.
Everyone told me otherwise, i ignored them, bought a shedload of naim, tried to get it to work, realised my ears had changed in the last 20 years and bingo, 6 months on I now have a totally different system which is exactly the sound that works for me rather than what I thought I wanted, and gives me qualities that a Naim system just can't. In terms of all the regular dem-room sonic criteria it offers the same level of performance as a 500 series reference system but at a third or quarter of the price.
There's not much wrong with Naim though IMO. You pay for great residuals, longevity, support, a wide knowledgeable user base (if a little blind sighted ), a brand that looks good and emotionally feels good and has in built consumer status. You are buying into something tried and tested and overall its a pretty non anxiety-laden purchase.
What does bother me though is the plethora of new products which get released monthly. It smacks of 'flavour of the month' marketing, much like your Canon digital cameras. There seem to be so many different naits and streamers and different CDPs now, Ive almost lost track. My suspicion is that there is now a mixture of great and not so great whereas 20 years ago everything from an ARO to a CDi and a Nac72 was a great product. The focused purity and simplicity of the company has been compromised. That said, I accept that this is modern day business and what one must do to prosper at a certain level and beyond.
Also the other thing that puts me off is the multiple box, never ending upgradeitis structure of it all which seems to afflict most users. Take a look at the forums and the endless "you need a hiline/555ps/252 to make it sound right" posts to witness what I refer to. It's my belief that a good system for a £1000 should be just that, a good system, which provides music for decades there onwards. It shouldn't need an IC or another power supply lavished on it to make it sound 'less harsh' for example. The prospect of always being able to add one more box which makes the old system sound 'broken' is one which IME inherently breeds disatisfaction and a focus on the gear rather than the musicians. Once you get to the 500 series it also seems that it is so damm tweaky and sensitive to setup. The slightest twist in a burndy or the slightest loosening of a Fraim spike and 60k's worth goes completely to pot. That would completely do my head in.
I think I also realised this time round that a lot of what attracted me to Naim in the old days was the small potting shed nature of the company, the slightly cultish looks and image and the esoteric underground nature of it all. But they moved away from that long ago now and other companies now like Tron and DV fullfill that image.
The last 3 paragraphs of course are all very subjective and my own personal feelings which won't apply to most people. The bottom line is always the sound and for many people, they still love the Naim groove which although radically different from the chrome sound, still seems to follow the same basic principles, albeit tweaked for a much larger audience. Use your ears and vote with your feet. I did, and just discovered that I wanted different things, preferably at more affordable prices as well.
Am a massive Naim fan and while i agree with most of your post and not so much with other parts you are one of the first people on here that as actually stated half decent reasons for not being a naim fan rather than trhey are just shite. I agree with the part about too many products released relatively fast and just hope they dont carry on this way much longer. I prefered naim as the " underground" kind of company myself rather that the one with massive adverts in all the mags. But as you said a company has to do whatever it can to make a success of its self and times have been easier than of recent. The part about the 500 series all going to pot if you dont set it up correctly though i cant agree with. Mine sounded just fine plonked on a cheap stand untill i bought the fraim. granted it does sound better now naim have set it up correctly and it sits on its proper stand but if you dont think finding the time to set up £60,000 is worth it then you are either silly or have money to burn.
but clearly post-sales maintenance is different from installation and setup as part of the sale. I.E. if a product is sold as having certain capabilities, at £60K it seems reasonable that the OEM and vendor in combination would see the sense in doing what they could to ensure satisfaction. It simply makes complete sense, akin to how one would expect to be treated if buying a £60K motor. Whether Naim like the comparison or not, they are pitching themselves at least in that Market (with its norms and expectations) if not beyond it. Clients of that type should be valued and cherished, not taken for granted and squeezed for a bit more cash.Most things require post-sales maintenance.
Most things require post-sales maintenance.
IMO, properly designed electronic kit should least for 15 years without the need for routine maintenance.
No Naim, No Avondale, No?
I thought that the sale of the product was supposed to include setting it up.but clearly post-sales maintenance is different from installation and setup as part of the sale. I.E. if a product is sold as having certain capabilities, at £60K it seems reasonable that the OEM and vendor in combination would see the sense in doing what they could to ensure satisfaction. It simply makes complete sense, akin to how one would expect to be treated if buying a £60K motor. Whether Naim like the comparison or not, they are pitching themselves at least in that Market (with its norms and expectations) if not beyond it. Clients of that type should be valued and cherished, not taken for granted and squeezed for a bit more cash.
We have our gas & heating on a maintenance contract and the bloke from the gas board comes around every year and gives it the once-over. Last time he replaced the timing controller.There is not one piece of electrical/electronic equipment in my home for which the manufacturer has specified periodic servicing. TV, recorder box, DVD player, clocks, radios, computers, printers, mobile 'phones etc, etc.
As far as I'm aware, the only item I have needing expert servicing is the central heating boiler.
IMO, properly designed electronic kit should least for 15 years without the need for routine maintenance.
Well, much of the Naim Chrome Bumper kit is a lot older than 15 years and still going strong without a service even if Naim recommend one, I have for example a 42.5 which sounds fresh as a daisy and has never been touched.
Also Les you do rather well, as do Naim, on the whole concept of service/ upgrade/mod.
I'm sure most would agree Naim kit is very well built and does last.
IMO, properly designed electronic kit should least for 15 years without the need for routine maintenance.