dave
Plywood King
PS bought new but not at RRP so dam good value
Two three-tier arrays cost me eleven pieces of Mana sold to a friend plus 75 cents;-)
PS bought new but not at RRP so dam good value
I'm sure there are also systems where performance isn't scuppered by a rogue cable touching a shelf or where performance from switch on doesn't take it's owner on a month's roller coaster ride of poor/sublime performance.
The point always has been how good do you want it to be? It's your money, it's your choice.
Quite so Dave, I'm sure there are also systems where performance isn't scuppered by a rogue cable touching a shelf or where performance from switch on doesn't take it's owner on a month's roller coaster ride of poor/sublime performance.
But that wouldn't be any fun. Such systems can't be any good and there owners have set them up so badly the poor bastards just don't realise.
Steve
You are pushing against an open door Dave, Bub didn't seem to be suggesting that setting your system up wasn't worth attention. Rather he was teasing some of the more lunatic exaggerations.
I certainly believe in keeping an eye on the old system set-up. Why even my car drives better when I've cleaned and detailed it.
Yeah, mine. It's a Naim system, only with good amplifiers and speakers. There's more hogwash written about Naim on teh intarwebs than any other subject, apart from religion. Naim's become its own religion, and the Naim forum is where it all originates.
Steve,
I've found some Naim source or preamp cables touching other objects can affect the sound under certain circumstances -the changes are small but audible and repeatible.
I've yet to hear a Naim component take more than eight days (CDS mk1) to sound its best. Even then, they only take that long on the first couple of power cycles IME. *Most with my experience are at max performance within five days if not less when they are new. All future power cycling seems to bring them up to snuff within 24 hours with the exception of the CDS2 which still takes four days here even though this is a seven year old unit.
YMMV and all...
maniacally yours,
dave
*olive only - I have no ref gear other than a NAPSC2 which really doesn't count.
So naim make bad amps aswell now do they, first the 552 was crap now the 300 & 500 are too? an by the way i actually chose naim speakers over the more expensive B&Ws so IMO the speakers cant be that bad either. Didnt like the older ones though ill give you that. I would actually argue now that you havnt heard any of these set up in a proper system, and i dont mean a 1hr demo in a show or a shop
I hate to break it to you (that's a lie), but the 300 and 500 are extremely expensive ways of buying a mediocre power amp. You actually chose Naim speakers? They must have seen you coming a long way away.
ive never heard one go form shit to good over time, if its sounds bad then something is a miss elsewhere IMO, the biggest change is from new to about a week or so after use but not that much, if it was am sure Naim would have them run in at the factory or everyone would be sending them back saying it was nothing like the demo one they heard. Personally i dotn turn mine off so ive nothing to worry about either way
or the speakers must of been better than you think ? why cant you get it through your head that maybe, just maybe I like the combo of naim preamps and power amps better than any others ive heard, and that maybe the ovators sound good when with the top end naim they were designed to be with, if you want cheap amps and pretend to yourself they are good then so be it, ill quite happily spend the money on Naim because i think they are worth it. oh and not only did i buy one i have ordered another 2, thats how bad they are
or the speakers must of been better than you think ? why cant you get it through your head that maybe, just maybe I like the combo of naim preamps and power amps better than any others ive heard, and that maybe the ovators sound good when with the top end naim they were designed to be with, if you want cheap amps and pretend to yourself they are good then so be it, ill quite happily spend the money on Naim because i think they are worth it. oh and not only did i buy one i have ordered another 2, thats how bad they are
IME the Fraim (in its untouched guise) is the 'handbag' that stylistically contains ones valuables, without actually enhancing its contents. From a purely functional perspective, it is somewhat compromised by the use of glass for the shelves. I have tried two different shelf materials, Corian (which made the CDS3 head unit less grainy, more dynamic and reduced a tendency of some lower end bloat) and the Sonority (which had an positive effect several times the magnitude-and price- of the Corian). I could however see that a standard Fraim could offer a sonic upgrade over something very flimsy and vibration prone, especially with equipment having moving parts (CD/turntable)
So far I have tried the Sonority under both my CDS3 head and the NAT01 (yes, it works just as well here too). Tonight I will employ an extra shelf and see how well it works under the XPS2.