Absolutely. Victorian cars weren't a means of transport, they were an expensive toy for the wealthy man. Most of them didn't actually work beyond being coaxed into life for a few minutes at a time.
FoS - anyone else here?
- Thread starter robs
- Start date
Not sure what a 'hyper' car is but allegedly this thing 'breathes the air it goes through', is 'made to be porous', and with 'incredible downforce achieved without any compromise'. I guess that means it's somehow a carbon lifeform with lots of holes and screwed to the floor; nice.
CHE
Nothing wrong with that. A motorised vehicle doesn't necessarily need to work as a means of transport, if you don't need it to. Guy Martin has a Merlin engine that he only fires up for fun.
-alan-
pfm Member
^ Not sure the likes of a rust-ridden Alfa 75 that drove to one track day, calved, was towed home and sat on the driveway gathering moss for 2 1/2 years until my wife got thick and sold it to some gentlemen of the travelling community for a handsome total of £25 remotely qualifies in that respect. 
(And as for the bought/kept for six years/never turned a wheel/ sold at another marked and duly noted loss garage-ornament that was the seized '72 911 that the kids still laugh about - Im not even going to go there.. )
(And as for the bought/kept for six years/never turned a wheel/ sold at another marked and duly noted loss garage-ornament that was the seized '72 911 that the kids still laugh about - Im not even going to go there.. )