I know the government has just cancelled 'Plan B' so it's a fair question. I suppose in my mind I'm thinking that something akin to Plan B restrictions, or something more stringent, is unlikely to be tolerated as the 'norm'. So restrictions on socialising, going to events, whether or not to wear masks, travel, workplaces... all the 'stuff' we've accepted for the last couple of years, for the greater good. Some of this is provided for in laws which have a sunset clause, some of it is done by public consent. Are we, in effect, saying 'those days when you could go to the pub, or a gig, or on holiday, or to work, without a care are gone, get over it'?
partner both have coughs but test negative and 7 month old youngest Grandaughter is unaffected. Mrs Mull has same cough..also testing negative. I felt shit for 1 day and also tested neg.
Cheers Ian I really should have a look but I know I'd find it too infuriating. I flicked it on briefly and there was Alice Roberts talking about public engagement with science - the same Alice Roberts who claimed that the government were performing an unethical experiment on the population by deliberately infecting us with the virus, and accused Public Health England of suppressing data by timing its release with a football match. These people are the worst thing to happen to the public understanding of science since the MMR fiasco, which some of their pals happened to have a hand in.
