1- to say "conventional" about a pan is to totally misrepresent the rarity and skill involved.
2- if we had a skinny person in white suit on silver bike racing by, this could possibly be very different -- instead, it's a fairly unattractive large blob with a lot of dark area.
1. Panning is easy, and is a conventional technique used daily around the world in sports photography. I don't recognise it as a rarity or particularly skilful, though I do enjoy executing pan shots. I'd yank your chain that it's something that only comes naturally and you get it or you don't, and that I'd been blessed; that's not my style. Rather, simply there's a mathematical formula that underpins panning, and a few simple guides that make up the technique. A little practice, and you should be able to nail it. It was very well defined in a book from the 70's/80's - Understanding 35mm photography by Carl Shipman, from memory. Relates focal length, distance to subject, speed of subject, and shutter speed. the rest is down to exposure, plane of motion (and how you match it), and whether or not your subject remains at a consistent distance to you throughout the arc of travel.
2. To you a large blob, to me it's mystery and intrigue amidst the movement!
I like the messy distraction against a well ordered image (of the disarray of cycle parking).
Rather than subvert the bicycle portrait thread, if you're interested in discussing panning and how to master the technique, we could start a discussion in a new thread. Let me know, happy to share.