advertisement


Anti-vaccine protesters… why?

Anti-vaxxers in the West have existed since Jenner's time. Some objections - such as in the safety of vaccines, invasion of personal rights, and religious - have remained constant and there have always been loud protesters.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1123944/

Screen-Shot-2021-10-04-at-5.25.12-PM-768x944.png
 
absolutely. It's a very good drug provided you keep it the fxxk away from women who are or may become pregnant.

Without taking The Google challenge
Thalidomide is now a very effective drug used to treat brain cancer, kidney cancer, Kaposi’s sarcoma and multiple myeloma.

Wow, without taking The Google challenge, thought that drug had been banned years ago.
 
A friend living in New Zealand posted this article about the anti-vaccine "movement" over there.
The crazy seems of be of a similar type the world over.
 
A friend living in New Zealand posted this article about the anti-vaccine "movement" over there.
The crazy seems of be of a similar type the world over.

NZ Govt policies have been so successful that it has given some the luxury to be complacent. But anti-vaxxers are very much a minority. Starting only 6 months ago NZ has reached UK levels of vaccination in double quick time.
 
Anti vax sentiment in the UK seems to be hovering around 16-22%, according to studies for the CCDH and YouGov this Summer (not sure if the numbers have changed appreciably since then). This goes to my observation that in pretty much any walk of life, there is a rump of people, perhaps around 10%, who spoil it for the rest. If we didn't have the 10% of criminals, spivs and chancers we'd need far fewer and less draconian laws. The 10% wealthy effectively oppress the remaining 90%, and so-on. So it is with the antivaxxers, apparently.
 
I’m surprised and disappointed it is that high. I’d have thought/hoped it was substantially <10%, maybe 5%.
 
Some people think the Earth is flat and at the centre of the universe.
What can you do?
 
Without taking The Google challenge


Wow, without taking The Google challenge, thought that drug had been banned years ago.

I don’t know what you mean by the Google challenge.
Your ignorance of its use may be because you do not have a brain cancer sufferer in the family.
I do.
 
Some people think the Earth is flat and at the centre of the universe.
What can you do?

Given that neither belief has the potential to kill as many as those underpinning a refusal to be vaccinated, I'd let them get on with it.
 
First off, I will make it clear that, just like Bill Gates where his kids are concerned, I am an anti-vaxxer (and proud of it).
I have researched them pretty extensively and come to the conclusion they are really not a good thing.

The ingredients are highly toxic - do you know what's in them? Have you read the leaflet that came with the vaccine when you have had one administered? If you haven't, you haven't given informed consent. Which, if you weren't already aware, is a direct breach of The Nuremberg Code.

So, you can have yourself injected with toxic substances and foetal cells if you want, as long as you are fully informed.

It would be an even better idea to inject yourself with toxic substances if they actually worked. Which they don't. For example, I know many people who have had the measles vaccine, and later got measles. I have lost count of the number of people who have had two 'Covid' vaccinations, and then got Covid (even before any adverse reactions, I have lost count of them. Who would have thought, you get ill after having toxins injected into you (clue: it's your body reacting to being poisoned). By the way, whatever they are injecting into you, it can't be Covid, because Covid has never been isolated in a laboratory and isolated according to Koch's Postulates. Offically and legally then, it doesn't exist. Courts in many countries, mostly recently in Spain a couple of weeks ago, have ruled it doesn't exist, and the UK government have admitted in a Freedom of Information request that it doesn't exist. But I digress.

I wouldn't inject toxic ingredients for no benefit, and possibly severe side effects up to and including death. In the case of Covid, I would rather take my chances for an illness with a 99.97% recovery rate and an average death age of 82 years 4 months (average UK life expectancy is 81 years 7 months). Furthermore, the government have admitted that having the Covid vaccine won't stop you spreading it or catching it, so why would you even have it. I am sure the people of PFM will tell me I am missing something. Not sure what. The current Covid 'vaccines' are experimental and have only been approved for emergency use, that is why the government keep extending the draconian and unlawful 'Covid Act', because it is emergency legislation and allows them to.

Want more?
Ok, if vaccines are safe, why has the Vaccine Injuries Compensation Board in the USA paid out billions of dollars (about $11 billion IIRC) in compensation for vaccine injuries?
We are led to believe that vaccines are some kind of magic bullet. The truth is they aren't, and they absolutely haven't been responsible for the eradication of illness - better sanitation was mostly responsible for that, vaccines came along later in the day. When there is an earthquake in a third-world country, what is the priority? It's clean water and sanitation, not injecting the survivors with toxins.

If you want to have a vaccine, go ahead, but do your research first and make a fully informed decision. I have, and there is no way on earth I will be going anywhere near them. I will trust my immune system.

I can imagine the spluttering and drinks being sprayed all over screens as this is being read. You can dismiss us anti-vaxxers as looneys if you like (I really don't care), or call us stupid, but we aren't telling you this for fun - we are telling you not to inject yourselves with poisons for no benefit. Sorry for being a bit radical and not wanting people to harm themselves.
 
In fairness you are so off the map politically your being an anti-science crusader is of little surprise. File under right-wing nutjob, as ever.
 
Wow. Full house playing nutter bingo there!

COVID doesn’t exist - check
Nuremberg - check
Do your own research - check
 
Thalidomide is now a very effective drug used to treat brain cancer, kidney cancer, Kaposi’s sarcoma and multiple myeloma.


Yes. I administered to patients in the 1990’s, although it may have been off-license/experimental back then. (we had various Professors attached to our unit and did a lot of research)

Off the top of my head, thalidomide works by reducing the blood supply to the cancerous tissue.
We were using it to treat a type of brain cancer.
 


advertisement


Back
Top