Although I have mixed feelings about all of them, if nothing else, this video from Amir proves Danny can design a crossover.
T
He did a "review" of the Harbeth P3ESR. It measured very well by his standards, but he did not like the quality of crossover components. Of course. I think the terms "cheesy" and "worst of the worst" came up... He declined to work up a modification because it wouldn't fit in the box. I suppose the LS3/5A would get a similar treatment from him, except it might show up more measurement irregularities.
Dueling dimwits, grab your popcorn!
He has a pair of Revel Salon 2’s, some Marc Levinson amps I think although occasionally he also uses a Purifi design,Wonder what Amir’s home system is.
Thanks Keith.He has a pair of Revel Salon 2’s, some Marc Levinson amps I think although occasionally he also uses a Purifi design,
Keith
I surely can't be the only one on pfm who's more than a little curious to hear his flagship line-array open baffle loudspeakers and servo subs?!
His speaker listening tests are somewhat unique. He seems to listen near-field to one speaker, using the same 5 tracks he has listened to thousands of times to assess the tonality. While this has its merits in verifying the frequency response he's just measured, this is not how speakers are designed to be used, is it.Indeed, it also proves that ASR also listens to equipment. It tells me something about those that claim otherwise.
His speaker listening tests are somewhat unique. He seems to listen near-field to one speaker, using the same 5 tracks he has listened to thousands of times to assess the tonality.
I surely can't be the only one on pfm who's more than a little curious to hear his flagship line-array open baffle loudspeakers and servo subs?!
Nope. He mentions that he does listening tests with one speaker in that video and elsewhere.The part I have highlighted is incorrect. You're confusing his listening test with his measurement tests.
Listening to a single speaker is fine if you’re assessing tonal accuracy, and listening to see what the speaker is or isn’t doing (as the likes of Harman do), but when you listen as part of a review, you have to listen using a pair - and certainly at the sort of distance they’ve been designed for - you’re not going to stick those LGK speakers (or near-field monitors) in a huge room and listen from 15ft away. You have to respect their intended use.Nope. He mentions that he does listening tests with one speaker in that video and elsewhere.
I can count on the fingers of one thumb the number of hi fi YouTubers that I’d trust as being honest and impartial. Erin is one of them; I think he endeavours to be as objective as possible. Either that or he is the world’s greatest con man.
What I do find ASR useful for is picking up issues of QC or corner cutting where there’s say gross channel imbalance, failure to meet claimed specification or performance generally that simply can’t justify the price tag. The zealotry among his acolytes is the off putting part.His speaker listening tests are somewhat unique. He seems to listen near-field to one speaker, using the same 5 tracks he has listened to thousands of times to assess the tonality. While this has its merits in verifying the frequency response he's just measured, this is not how speakers are designed to be used, is it.
Unlike other reviewers, he doesn't seem to set them up properly and have prolonged listening sessions with a variety of music to try and assess the designer's intentions and see who they might appeal to. In fact he seems to think that's unnecessary and there are simply well designed (flat), and incompetently designed (coloured) loudspeakers. It's this complete dismissal of subjectivity that I dislike about ASR. You just have to look at the Cranage thread to see that people have quite different tastes. If they didn't, KEF would be the only company selling speakers.