TheDecameron
Unicorns fart glitter.
Well, Pritti Patel is backing Boris.Rory Stewart has said he wont serve under Johnson because he’s dangerous. The pool of talent is evaporating very quickly.
Well, Pritti Patel is backing Boris.Rory Stewart has said he wont serve under Johnson because he’s dangerous. The pool of talent is evaporating very quickly.
Are you implying there something wrong with Gavin Williamson, Andrew Bridgen and Nark Francois?The use of the term "Talent" is slighly over-egging the pudding in this context, I feel.
Duncan is incredibly pompous and I know it’s hard to believe but even slower on his feet than Johnson. It’s as though the rise of Johnson has been the making of Duncan, purely as Johnson’s detractor rather than for any contribution to government.Alan Duncan is looking typically smug about his resignation.
Rory Stewart has said he wont serve under Johnson because he’s dangerous. The pool of talent is evaporating very quickly.
Well, Pritti Patel is backing Boris.
She’s also astonishingly unintelligent. She makes Francois sound eruditeNo surprise there. She's the most transparently venal and self serving of the lot of them.
I hate her.
Did Charlie prefer administering it?Surely Charlie Elphicke will now have the whip withdrawn again?
I have no problem with the membership choosing who should be leader.
But if that leads directly to an unelected PM the law should change.
So, ok if in opposition, if in govt a general election should be mandatory.
That's just daft. Should there be a General Election if a PM dies or has to retire through ill-health and has to be replaced, even if an election had been held earlier that year?
Oddly, it isn’t daft. The answer is Yes.That's just daft. Should there be a General Election if a PM dies or has to retire through ill-health and has to be replaced, even if an election had been held earlier that year?
That's just daft. Should there be a General Election if a PM dies or has to retire through ill-health and has to be replaced, even if an election had been held earlier that year?
That's just daft. Should there be a General Election if a PM dies or has to retire through ill-health and has to be replaced, even if an election had been held earlier that year?
The question, I think, is whether the Government is effectively changed by a change in the PM. So, changes in policy from what was voted for in the last PM's manifesto, or a material change in emphasis or priority of the manifesto positions.That's just daft. Should there be a General Election if a PM dies or has to retire through ill-health and has to be replaced, even if an election had been held earlier that year?