SASTUSBULBAS asks about speakers, but of course, the source and pre. have to be up to the job!
With my ProAc Response 4 speakers weighing in at 127kg each, I feel in my case that amplification is much more a determiner of base (Naim 135s), assuming my room acoustics are ok.
A seamless wide dynamic range is a far more important criterion, surely.
Hello,
Yes I agree, rooms and amplification are important for bass performance, but they are not going to re-adjust the speakers frequency responce and dynamic capability are they?
One of the things I find with my own kit, is different bass performance with different speakers. Hence some's perception of a particular CD's bass performance. Some CD's I have have superb LF effects and performance, which disapears. or sounds lacking, in an undynamic system with strong bass but not much below 40hz.
I was just curious to puting systems to the music and taste of some posters here.
I myself use a varity of kit, usually Kef R107, Kef R105.4, Rogers Studio 1, Linn Kan MkII, and Cerwin Vega V-152. With amplification from Krell and Classe, and an old Technics SU-MA10 as examples. Though I also find source important.
For instance, the Technics set up is much improved if I use an EAD CD transport with a Genesis Digital Lense, into the Technics digital section, this is with my Linn Kans. I do not get bass depth, but (for the package) quite superb percussion with well recorded CD's, and superb dynamics. Percussion and bass performance suffers in this system if I remove the Genesis lense.
At work I am using the Cerwin Vega's, but some CD's sound so completely different, lacking that low low end, that I find them less enjoyable.