Seeker_UK
Feelin' nearly faded as my jeans
John Major started PFI.
Yes, but their employment until 1997 was relatively small; it was the Blair government who really kicked the backside out of them.
John Major started PFI.
Indeed. And Labour thought it was such a good idea because it got spending off the books instead of seeing it for the bloody stupid idea it wasJohn Major started PFI.
If I was spending £40k/year on school fees I'd really hope the education they provided was 'better' than the local comp.
Sure it is. You'd meet a class of person, old boys' network and all that. You'd learn how to speak well and to behave well. All this is very important to get on in the world, and I can well understand how someone who could manage it would think it was money well spent.
It isn’t that the teachers are better, it’s that in smaller classes the teacher has more time per pupil. You could improve state education overnight by limiting class sizes to that of £40000 pa fee paying schoolsIf I was spending £40k/year on school fees I'd really hope the education they provided was 'better' than the local comp.
I teach English and I lead an SEN provision. Best of both worlds!D'you mean that those increasing interest payments on gov't debt are a load of hogwash? There's me thinking that the debt was owed to global investors (which is not exactly passing the 'buck' from treasury to BoE and back).
Out of interest, there are a fair number of teachers or ex-teachers on this forum and I suspect that many or most are teachers of non academic subjects. Yes, one or two are in the science and maths area but rarely have I come across English, languages, geography and history. Just an impression, mind, and I could be way out in my observations.
I have to express my ignorance here, on how primary, secondary and tertiary education has changed over the years since I was at the chalk-face. My friend is beyond retirement but still teaching physics and maths in a college but all he does is orally belittle and criticise his own management's incompetence. However, he's now on a point two, mainly evening classes, so has less daily contact to complain about.
It stands to reason though that these schools can cherry pick the best and the rest have to deal with the restIt isn’t that the teachers are better, it’s that in smaller classes the teacher has more time per pupil. You could improve state education overnight by limiting class sizes to that of £40000 pa fee paying schools
Class sizes, increasing staff absence and cover are big issues.It stands to reason though that these schools can cherry pick the best and the rest have to deal with the rest
Absolutely. I’ve been in all sorts of schools and there is always of good, bad, and indifferent teaching. Except in a bog standard school there is nowhere for a bad or indifferent teacher to hide. Show me a good school and I’ll show you a school with good kids.It stands to reason though that these schools can cherry pick the best and the rest have to deal with the rest
And workloadClass sizes, increasing staff absence and cover are big issues.
I teach English and I lead an SEN provision. Best of both worlds!
I teach English KS3 and SEN. My background is Primary, Special Schools, PRUs, LSUs, SENCo, KS3 English etc. I worked for DFE for a while delivering training on behaviour. I have been everywhere and loved the variety. My original degree was Fine Art! It’s been a really interesting ride. I’m now an SeN/ Nurture/ Deputy Senco which appears to be a sweet spot for me.Wow! Had a go at SEN (both levels) when I was at college, I think. Not for me, though an interesting experience. However, that was before my first teaching post. Made i/c remedial within 18 months but that was a headmaster dumping tactic and was awful with whole mornings or afternoons with the same class and my own curriculum; not a happy time. Had supply days at (I think) a school for dyslexia (or sth similar), which was okay. Upper juniors and sec. was my comfort area in supply.
D'you teach English at SEN level or is that a separate entity?