Nah, just an anti-measurist warrior.Just popped back in to see how this could still be going, now I see, 96 pages of shilling. I asked on November 5th if this had anything to do with a commercial product but didn’t get an answer to that question and low and behold after hundreds of posts the main protagonist of this thread is saying he’s launching a company which will be selling a network switch. Who’d have thought it?
I wonder why that could possibly be.Most impartial observers (in the rational world) would not conclude that your "temerity in moving into the trade" is the issue here, though you understandably feel the need to frame it like that.
Ah, the assembled Likers in action. How cute, how predictable.Perhaps you should start a trade thread about it if you want to limit what opinion people can give.
Maybe pay Tony for the 96 pages of free ad you've had from this thread. After all you think it's about your product already ..
Zombie’s Law by any chance?"The amount of energy needed to refute b-sh*t is an order of magnitude bigger than that needed to produce it."
I applaud anyone with the entrepreneurial spirit and nouse to start a business. I'd love to do the same but wouldn't know where to start.
I've bought plenty of 'shed-built' bits and bobs and I love seeing all the stuff talented folk have on offer in, for example, the traders section of Lenco Heaven.
None of this stuff is a cure for cancer - and the end of the day it's all just toys that people are free to buy or not. All good fun and not to be taken very seriously.
My only observation would be that if you're going into business selling hi-fi foo/accessories (delete as required) you probably need a bit of a thick skin.
Fear not. All tested,CE-certified etc, and most definitely functionally tested.Launching an electrical product without testing? I hope there is full awareness of the myriad electrical safety and what ever the UK has replaced CE with after Brexit (and CE too if you want to sell in the large EU market).
Even if one chooses to completely ignore any functional testing to demonstrate audio improvement - you still need a bunch of testing done before you can certify a product onto the market.
Man I was about to say the same thing!‘factometer’. Sure that isn’t a BS meter…you remind me of that guy trying to flog small active ‘speakers’ on here from a few years ago…
One day you may be invited to do jury service. Phrases like beyond reasonable doubt may be used. You will hear and see mainly verbal accounts, sometimes conflicting, and will rarely be presented with "proof" of the sort you appear to expect here..
I was wondering if it was an actual head clamp so you don't move during blind testing.
The entire thread is now functionally an ad-hom attack on The Flash.
It's against the AUP. Just saying.
Yes. Like the ones used for Victorian photography. The point being that in almost all normal domestic rooms even a slght movement of the head alters the sound. As, alas, some does previous recent exposure to sound. Hence exactly the same recording played on the same kit, etc, can "sound different" if your head isn't *exactly where it was before. Even then, comparisons run many times have shown that even playing exactly the same thing though the same setup, etc, more than once is quite often judged to be 'different' in tests where a difference in the replay system may *or may not* have been made.