Russia wouldn’t launch Kalibr cruise missiles at Ukrainian govt sites in Kiev would they? Like Zelensky is warning after Dugina was bumped off.
I don't wish to derail this thread, but to answer your question, which I'm assuming is rhetorical, with my own thoughts and observations:
I made the comment, thinking along broader lines of how Johnson sees himself as an esteemed international statesman, but what everybody and his dog sees is something quite different. Emperors new clothes and all that. But maybe the analogy is misplaced in this context.
I’ve been considering whether this visit was more due to an initiative from Zelenskyy, appealing to the Johnson vanity project to attend Independence Day of Ukraine; the consensus as reported by the media that this would be when Putin initiates a renewed attack upon Kyiv. But would Putin risk killing, inadvertently or otherwise, the UK Prime Minister? The inevitable consequence would surely be to trigger intervention by NATO into the conflict. And Putin, to avoid losing face, would have to stand by his vainglorious threats and ultimatums and launch the nukes. (Instead, Putin attacks a different civilian target, killing 22 people at a railway station in Chaplyne. And the atrocities continue unabated.)
The above scenario explains why, earlier in the conflict, there was no continued and targeted attack upon Johnson or other visiting heads of state (that I’m aware of). And crucially, this is what Zelenskyy is banking on. (Have the Americans, projecting forward, miscalculated by taking a leaf out of his book by having Pelosi visit Taiwan? . .)
Just speculation of course, though I do find a morbid irony that the international statesmanship and respect Johnson craves can surely only be made possible by his death. Johnson ought to be careful for what he wishes.
John