You're still making no sense. If the government could pay for anything it wanted simply by "printing" money, there'd be no need for taxes or budget debates.
The evolution of human activity comes from questions, only then do we reach towards answers. If you want answers, you first need questions.
It wasn’t until Copernicus asked if the earth was the centre of the universe and observed that it was not, that Newton was able to develop some answers about how and why.
However, the sarcasm in your posts suggests you are not ready to ask yourself questions about tax being at the centre of the economic universe. Just as the Priests and Theologians of the 15th century were convincing and wrong about the role of the earth at the centre of the cosmos, so the Blessed St Margret was very, very convincing but just as wrong about the role of tax
The first question to probe learned assumptions is that question of logic already asked, how can a government run out of the thing it creates, and since we came off the gold standard, creates it from nothing?
Another comes from an Oxfam Report
Profiting from Pain released today and comes on the back of my previous question about government debt being an asset for a few and a liability for the many. Gabriella Butcher from Oxfam on Today this morning pointed out that during the pandemic a new Billionaire has been created every 30 hours, and the report tells us that Billionaire profits have increased as much during the last 24 months as over the last 23 years. This at a time when our Chancellor has raised tax on poorer people to ‘pay for the pandemic’.
If tax is the fund of spending, where did all those new billionaire get their money from before the tax rise? Further, and more important, like debt, why was the Pandemic an asset for a few, but a Liability for the taxpayer? If the government bung to billionaires came from borrowing, who did the government borrow from? And why do the recipients of that loan not have to pay it back, but ordinary taxpayers do?
The Pandemic proves beyond doubt that the government can create as much money as it wants when it wants. Before the Pandemic Theresa May told us that there was no money, yet come the Pandemic there is oodles. The truth that tax revenue is not the source of government spending should be clear from that observation. This is not a new observation and it is not controversial. Keynes famously said that government ‘can afford anything it can do’ and as long ago as 1943 the chair of the New York Reserve said that ‘Taxes for revenue are obsolete’.
Taxes do not fund government spending but that does not mean that there is no need for taxes. The purpose of tax is the create demand for the issued currency, also they are needed to control inflation and to encourage or discourage certain types of desirable or undesirable activity. Likewise there would still need to be budgets and government spending would still need to be carefully controlled so as to avoid inflation, but it would be inflation, need and the availability of resources to meet the need, not tax, that is the basis of budgetary constraint.