I don't know what makes you think I reached that conclusion. You're off the mark.
Ha! Quite good, but don't give up the old day job yet, Steve
There were only two flavours on offer, both bitter, and that was stay or leave. I voted for bitter.
Now if you were to ask what I had hoped for, then my reply would be that it isn't what we're seeing so far. Very early on I stated on one of this thread's predecessors that I thought we would end up with a version of 'controlled borders' that equated to something far closer to free movement, that we would be continuing to pay in against specific priorities, and that against that background a fairly liberal and open FTA would have been achievable. I was interested in the 'Booker' solution, for Britain to seek membership of EFTA and take a place on the EFTA Court. Despite seeing the EU for what it is, I'm afraid I stupidly underestimated its fury, intransigence, and its Machiavellian determination to use everything in its powers to overturn the result, and when that failed, to continue to hold the UK in its regulatory orbit. So too did I not forsee the (successive) British government's woeful and at times seemingly gratuitous ineptitude, nor the two-facedness of Whitehall and the British 'establishment', both of which remained in cahoots with the EU, and manipulatively supportive of its efforts to hold the UK against the result of the referendum.